CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Odd results with view factor + solar load

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Yann

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 17, 2022, 00:10
Default Odd results with view factor + solar load
  #1
Member
 
Bushra Rasheed
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 97
Rep Power: 5
B_R_Khan is on a distinguished road
Hi!

I am simulating a case with view factor radiation modeling turned on along with solar load model. The qr primary results I am getting seem reasonable but the total qr contours I am getting are very distorted and have very unreasonable values. I am attaching screenshots for reference.


The bottom face is opaque reflective with (0.03 0.07) absorptivity / emisssivity

Please help!


Thanks!
Attached Images
File Type: png qprimary_norma.png (20.2 KB, 18 views)
File Type: png qr distorted.png (22.4 KB, 17 views)
File Type: png distorted qr cells.png (41.7 KB, 19 views)
B_R_Khan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 17, 2022, 05:30
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Yann
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: France
Posts: 1,070
Rep Power: 26
Yann will become famous soon enough
Hi,

Just my 2 cents, but I think the "distortion" you see on the qr cells is related to the face agglomeration performed before computing the view factors.

Depending on which faces are agglomerated together, and where the grouped faces are located relatively to the shadow of your object, you might get those weird values.

I hope this helps somehow.

Yann
B_R_Khan likes this.
Yann is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 17, 2022, 06:06
Default
  #3
Member
 
Bushra Rasheed
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 97
Rep Power: 5
B_R_Khan is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yann View Post
Hi,

Just my 2 cents, but I think the "distortion" you see on the qr cells is related to the face agglomeration performed before computing the view factors.

Depending on which faces are agglomerated together, and where the grouped faces are located relatively to the shadow of your object, you might get those weird values.

I hope this helps somehow.

Yann
Thanks for replying

I checked face agglomeration . Actually the distortion started to come when I divided the panel boundaries into front panel surface and rear panel surface ( My previous qr values were very low i.e. 170 W/m2 for solar radiations) . I included only rear surface and ground in view factor boundaries and then this error started to come.
B_R_Khan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 18, 2022, 04:53
Default
  #4
Member
 
Bushra Rasheed
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 97
Rep Power: 5
B_R_Khan is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yann View Post
Hi,

Just my 2 cents, but I think the "distortion" you see on the qr cells is related to the face agglomeration performed before computing the view factors.

Depending on which faces are agglomerated together, and where the grouped faces are located relatively to the shadow of your object, you might get those weird values.

I hope this helps somehow.

Yann
Wanted to ask another thing if you know. I am getting q primary rad values of 360 W/m2 for both bands and reasonable shading as well. But the value of qr is very unrealistic. Do you know how openfoam calculates qr in view factor+solar load modeling? Assuming that qr is total radiation heat flux, then how did it become zero in areas which has q primary rad values of 360 W/m2?
B_R_Khan is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
radiation heat flux, solar load model, view factor model


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how to view the complete results shokry FLOW-3D 5 February 3, 2009 13:56
load multiples results en CFX-post Lana CFX 1 September 16, 2008 11:20
CFDesign v9.0 won't load results Joe Shifrin Autodesk Simulation CFD 5 July 31, 2008 11:49
view results file... Gopal CFX 1 October 9, 2006 01:30
CFX load Results file furkan CFX 2 August 24, 2006 07:18


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:22.