 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
|
|
February 8, 2024, 23:46
|
V10 vs V7 SteadyState Solvers
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Desh
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Sydney
Posts: 108
Rep Power: 5  |
Hi,
I recently moved into OF V10 from OF V7, and I found out, I can run lot of chtMultiRegion cases under SteadyState in V10 without crashing, where in V7 I cannot and had to use a Transient (say Euler) solver. It seems like V10 offers better stability to solvers ? The only different I see is that I do not have to define 'SIMPLE' scheme in fvSolution file for V10. Can someone shred some light on this ? what is the theoretical background for this ? Thanks, Dasith |
|
|
|
|
 |
| Tags |
| solver convergence, v10 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| So it's all just Taylor Expansion, Runge Kutta integration and Gauss-Seidel solvers? | aerosayan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | October 24, 2021 07:42 |
| Question regarding transient solvers and steadyState | Shibi | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | May 14, 2021 11:24 |
| Should I focus on explicit or implicit solvers for transient simulations? | aerosayan | Main CFD Forum | 1 | April 11, 2021 07:31 |
| FSI solvers - best solvers | steven123 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | July 8, 2014 10:26 |
| Problem with steadyState solvers using pressure BC | Victor | OpenFOAM | 1 | December 14, 2009 05:40 |
Hybrid Mode
