|January 24, 2009, 20:28||
Hi everyone, What's the point
M. Mahdi Salehi
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 50Rep Power: 10
What's the point of defining mvConvection object? why not simply using fvm:div(phi, Yi) and fvm:div(phi, h)?
|August 27, 2011, 05:00||
All the div(phi, Yi) and div(phi, h) have a similar discretization form, except for the tracked variable. With mvConvection object, you can use a single surface interpolator (multivariateSurfaceInterpolationScheme) for all the div(phi, Yi) which will save a lot of efforts for setting the discretization scheme. Such a treatment can also speed up calculation relative to the form of fvm:div(phi, Yi).
Hope this helps.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|ReactingFoam||vassilis||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||75||September 11, 2013 15:22|
|DieselFoam and ReactingFoam||matteo_rosa_sentinella||OpenFOAM Pre-Processing||4||September 28, 2009 10:35|
|ReactingFoam solver||muthukaalai||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||1||June 16, 2008 13:36|
|ReactingFoam without reactions||lasb||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||5||June 10, 2008 08:50|
|ReactingFoam error||prashant24983||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||3||October 4, 2007 04:54|