|
[Sponsors] |
November 15, 2009, 14:11 |
|
#11 |
Member
Marco Turchi
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pesaro, Italy
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 16 |
I modify "channelOodles" tutorial like this: 3.5 x 2 x 2 with 80*180*120, and I have Retau = 180 (more or less).
Your resolution is better then my resolution, but what about your Retau? Are your results good? Is it like Moser or Marusic DNS? The most evident difference are urms, my urms are 2.5 instead 2.8! But other quantities are not so bad. I thik that my channel is too small, and also finite volume are less conservative than spectral method, for example. What do you thik about this? I am interesting on it. What I want to do it's a good channel DNS, but it is not so simple that I thought!!! Bye MT |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is GUI there for OpenFoam | navaladi | OpenFOAM | 4 | September 11, 2023 13:35 |
OpenFoam vs CFX5 mass balance in OpenFoam | tangd | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 33 | May 23, 2010 16:36 |
[blockMesh] CheckMesh error using a tutorial from OpenFOAM 114 with openFOAM 13 | martapajon | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 7 | January 21, 2008 12:52 |
OpenFOAM users in Munich OpenFOAM benutzer in M%c3%bcnchen | jaswi | OpenFOAM | 0 | August 3, 2007 13:11 |
A new Howto on the OpenFOAM Wiki Compiling OpenFOAM under Unix | mbeaudoin | OpenFOAM Installation | 2 | April 28, 2006 08:54 |