Problem in the flow calculation around airfoil

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 February 11, 2008, 19:34 Dear all, I'm calculating l #1 swlee Guest   Posts: n/a Sponsored Links Dear all, I'm calculating lift and drag for 2d airfoil(aoa is 6 degree). I've already checked and followed the other posts. But, I didn't get a resonable result with icoFoam(or turbFoam) and potentialFoam. My problem was just successed with simpleFoam. Here are the image of my calculation domain and the results with strange velocity at the trailing edge. This grid was combined by several multi-block sub domains and tested by "checkMesh" utility. checkMesh said like this, Checking geometry... Domain bounding box: (-0.5 -2 0) (0.75 1 0.01) Boundary openness (-1.82318e-18 3.41252e-19 1.9459e-16) OK. ***High aspect ratio cells found, Max aspect ratio: 20349.8, number of cells 2204 <

 February 11, 2008, 19:51 What is the problem in the abo #2 swlee Guest   Posts: n/a What is the problem in the above calculation? Does anyone have some advice that I should check? Sung Wook

 February 12, 2008, 01:25 Hey Sung, your mesh at the #3 Member   Patrick Bourdin Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 40 Rep Power: 10 Hey Sung, your mesh at the trailing edge is kinda rough! Only 2 cells on the trailing edge (TE) base is not enough. Try to have at least 10-ish cells there. Also make sure the LE and TE spacings on the upper and lower surfaces are of the order of 0.001*chord or less. If it's not already the case, try as well to pack at least 100 cells on each of these surfaces (with the previous constraints at the TE and LE). Also the quality of your mesh could easily be improved with a C-grid instead of a O-grid. If you want to stick to the O grid, use some kind of laplacian smoothing during the grid generation to make it a bit more orthogonal, and/or use at least 3 non-Orthogonal correctors for the pressure equation. You'll get the computation started with 1st order upwind schemes for the convective terms and perhaps some limited laplacian schemes. Later on, if convergence settles in, switch to 2nd order. Good Luck, Patrick

 September 9, 2010, 11:51 #4 New Member     Darío Montes Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Córdoba, Argentina Posts: 12 Rep Power: 9 Hello Sung, Did you fix your problem? I am trying a 0015 with potentialFoam and I have the same high velocities in the t.e. Any tip will be helpfull Best regards!!

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Kraemer CFX 10 April 16, 2011 07:22 Zmur CFX 2 December 23, 2008 17:35 ganesh Main CFD Forum 2 June 27, 2005 13:57 Hellen Main CFD Forum 2 May 27, 2005 04:06 Paul CFX 0 August 11, 2003 22:45