|
[Sponsors] |
Problem with LaunderSharma compressible turbulence model wrong formulation |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 3, 2006, 04:39 |
maybe I'm not right, but in La
|
#1 |
Member
Luca M.
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Luzern, Switzerland
Posts: 59
Rep Power: 17 |
maybe I'm not right, but in LaunderSharma compressible model Epsilon equation, we have that :
... + fvm::SuSp((C3 - 2.0/3.0*C1)*rho_*divU, epsilon_) and in the default turbulenceProperties file we have: C3 = -0.33 I think that we have to change the default value of C3 as: C3 = 0.33 or we have to change the formulation of Epsilon eq. as: ... + fvm::SuSp((- C3 - 2.0/3.0*C1)*rho_*divU, epsilon_) or ... - fvm::SuSp(( C3 + 2.0/3.0*C1)*rho_*divU, epsilon_) because the term C3*rho_*divU has to be positive in RHS of Epsilon equation. I'm right ?!? Luca |
|
July 3, 2006, 06:34 |
Please post a bug report (in O
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Mattijs Janssens
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,419
Rep Power: 26 |
Please post a bug report (in OpenFOAM-bugs) if you think it is incorrect.
|
|
July 3, 2006, 06:37 |
Nope - this is to do with the
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,907
Rep Power: 33 |
Nope - this is to do with the C3 term in engines simulations, where it turns out that a "small positive constant" C3 actually needs to be negative to get the right behaviour. Find an old-ish engines modelling Thesis from Imperial College and you will find the details.
Hrv
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk |
|
July 3, 2006, 07:21 |
so why we have different formu
|
#4 |
Member
Luca M.
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Luzern, Switzerland
Posts: 59
Rep Power: 17 |
so why we have different formulation in epsilon Eqn. between LaunderSharmaKE and kEpsilon turbulence model, (except f2() term)
kEpsilon C1*G*epsilon_/k_ - fvm::SuSp(((2.0/3.0)*C1 + C3)*rho_*divU, epsilon_) - fvm::Sp(C2*rho_*epsilon_/k_, epsilon_) LaunderSharmaKE C1*G*epsilon_/k_ + fvm::SuSp((C3 - 2.0/3.0*C1)*rho_*divU, epsilon_) - fvm::Sp(C2*f2()*rho_*epsilon_/k_, epsilon_) Luca |
|
July 3, 2006, 07:24 |
In that case: hmm. What does
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,907
Rep Power: 33 |
In that case: hmm. What does the original paper say?
Hrv
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Compressible Turbulence Model Implementations | shaun | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | October 21, 2009 12:55 |
compressible turbulence model | shuo | Main CFD Forum | 3 | December 22, 2007 10:51 |
Problem calculate Y in compressible turbulence model | luca | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | June 1, 2006 06:53 |
viscous force: Cfx : wrong formulation ???? | tommy | CFX | 0 | May 11, 2006 10:17 |
Steady state formulation of turbulence ?? | Jitendra | Main CFD Forum | 1 | June 27, 2000 19:49 |