|
[Sponsors] |
Laplacian viscous stress term in compressible solver |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 22, 2006, 05:24 |
Hello,
for compressible vis
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello,
for compressible viscous computations I intend to use/modify the sonicFoam solver, but a few things I don't understand: - the viscous term is given as a laplacian (the case forwardStep is discussed in sec. 3.3 of the P-guide) and I can not see why. Only for incompressible flows the stress reduces to laplacian(mu, U). Is there a reason for it? I tried to incorporate the full stress tensor, but this is only possible in explicit form because the function grad(U) is only available in the fvc class and now I model it by: volTensorField gradU = fvc::grad(U); mu*(( gradU + gradU.T() ) - 2.0/3.0*fvc::div(U)*tensor::I); but the solver gets less stable, especially for larger mu. Is there a reason why I can't use grad(U) in implicit form (why it is not available in the fvm class)? Is there another way to do this implicitly? -Furthermore I see from the results that the choice of outflow boundary conditions (zerogradient on p, T, U) is not ideal since it generates an artificial boundary layer on the outflow, see also figure 3.8 in the P-guide). For my work a correct boundary treatment is essential. Is there a specific reason for this choice of boundary conditions? It seems to mee that it is not the usual case for Navier-Stokes outflow conditions. regards, Jelmer |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
viscous stress | Shuo | Main CFD Forum | 1 | December 11, 2007 10:09 |
Incompressible viscous stress in sonicFoam | vitke | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | September 8, 2007 17:44 |
Viscous term approximations | cfd_newbie | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 28, 2005 20:23 |
Re: viscous source term | mt | Phoenics | 10 | February 11, 2005 10:46 |
Is the viscous dissipation term fully included? | yann | Phoenics | 0 | June 5, 2003 10:23 |