|
[Sponsors] |
|
January 27, 2010, 15:51 |
nut and nuTilda
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Dear Foamers,
I am new to OpenFOAM, so my question may be silly. What's the difference between nut and nuTilda? Isn't nut for kinematic turbulence viscosity? But what for nuTilda? Thanks, Phile |
|
January 29, 2010, 00:43 |
|
#2 | |
Member
|
Quote:
I am also confused about this. And I have checked the OpenFOAM Programmer's C++ Reference, which you can find in the website of opencfd ltd. It seems nuTilda is a parameter for LES simulation. However, I donot know much about LES. If you can please check it and tell me about it if possible. Jinbiao |
||
January 29, 2010, 02:25 |
|
#3 |
Super Moderator
Niklas Nordin
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 693
Rep Power: 29 |
perhaps it might help if you check in src/turbulenceModels/incompressible/RAS/SpalartAllmaras
and scroll to the bottom of the .C file nut_.internalField() = fv1*nuTilda_.internalField(); |
|
January 29, 2010, 03:07 |
|
#4 |
Member
|
Thanks. Niklas. It does help a lot.
It is great to find out the answer. nuTilda should be Spalart-Allmaras variable. So it belongs to the Spalart-Allmaras model which is one of the RAS model. That is to say, when I am using the k-e model, I donot need it. Am I right? Jinbiao Last edited by JinBiao; January 29, 2010 at 03:24. |
|
January 29, 2010, 03:44 |
|
#5 |
Super Moderator
Niklas Nordin
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 693
Rep Power: 29 |
correct
|
|
February 1, 2010, 11:32 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Anonymous
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 16 |
I was really confused since the nuTilda file exists even with kEpsilon models in the tutorial. Now I know it is superfluous.
Thank you, guys! Phile |
|
September 30, 2010, 10:48 |
nut is needed after V1.6
|
#7 |
New Member
Jie (Jay) Zhang
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ, U.S.
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 15 |
nut (turb viscosity) is needed after V1.6
|
|
January 30, 2011, 19:25 |
|
#8 |
Member
Davide Lupo Conti
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 16 |
hello everyone!
can someone tell me how to initialize nut and nuTilda? I always used kOmegaSST and for those I found the formulas to initialize k and omega, but I couldn't find out how to initialize variables for spalartAlllmaras.. Thank you! |
|
January 31, 2011, 09:29 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
Travis Carrigan
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 161
Rep Power: 15 |
If I understand correctly, If you'd like to initialize and record nut and nuTilda when using kOmegaSST, simply place them in the 0 directory and set them to 0...or you could calculate them based on k and omega.
Because nut and nuTilda aren't required when using kOmegaSST (only k and omega are required), by placing the nut and nuTilda dictionary files in the 0 directory, you're forcing OpenFOAM to record those values at each iteration. This is good for postprocessing as you don't have to calculate them yourself after the simulation is over. Note: I believe that nut and nuTilda are only required for the SpalartAllmaras turbulence model. Hope this helps. |
|
January 31, 2011, 18:55 |
|
#10 |
Member
Davide Lupo Conti
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi Trevis,
thanks for the quick reply.. I realized now that the post was written in an awful English...(late night...) I well know that nut and nuTilda are not requested when using kOmegaSTT... Now I am testing spalartAllmaras model and I don't know which values assign in the 0/nut and 0/nuTilda... (i'm using freestream bc everywhere except for on the foil, where I'm using wallfunctions for nut and fixedvalue for nuTilde )... Thaks! |
|
February 9, 2011, 09:55 |
|
#11 |
Member
|
Hello!
I have a question... I use Spalart-Allmaras model, so I need nut and nuTilda. As I understand, nut is turbulent viscosity and nuTilda is kinematic turbulenr viscosity. Am I right? And how can I calculate them? |
|
June 12, 2020, 20:13 |
|
#12 | |
Senior Member
Claudio Boezio
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Europe
Posts: 137
Rep Power: 7 |
Quote:
|
||
November 27, 2018, 02:37 |
|
#13 |
New Member
Vidyuth
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 7 |
Hi, can you please tell me the formulas for determining epsilon and omega values?
|
|
December 31, 2014, 18:55 |
|
#14 | |
New Member
Altan
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
nut> dynamic turbulence viscosity nutilda> kinamatic turbulence viscosity aren't they? and what is the different ? |
||
January 4, 2015, 20:54 |
|
#15 | |
Member
Eric Robertson
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 95
Rep Power: 14 |
Quote:
The field "nut" is the actual "turbulent viscosity" and is proportional to "nuTilda" by the fv1 function, where fv1 is locally a function of the viscosity ratio nuTilda/nu. One should always initialize the field "nuTilda" appropriately. |
||
February 16, 2011, 03:11 |
|
#16 | |
Member
Robert Ong
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 86
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
What is the appropriate value for fv1? some say 0.1 the others say 0.5?? Thanks and regards, Robert |
||
February 16, 2011, 03:42 |
|
#17 |
Member
Robert Ong
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 86
Rep Power: 15 |
||
August 6, 2012, 16:08 |
|
#18 |
New Member
Rafael Valenzuela Musura
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 14 |
rob3rt 0ng
Can you answer the question you've asked please I don't know what value should I use! thanks! |
|
August 6, 2012, 23:49 |
|
#19 |
Member
Robert Ong
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 86
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi Rafael,
From Turbulence modelling for CFD book by D. Wilcox, fv1 is defined as x^3/(x^3 + cv1^3), where x is nut/nu and cv1 is a closure coefficient of 7.1. In my case, fv1 adds up to 1.00. Regards, Robert |
|
August 7, 2012, 21:09 |
|
#20 |
New Member
Rafael Valenzuela Musura
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 14 |
Yes but the X is defines as nutilda/nu so i'm confused. Nut is dependent only for the "arbitrary" value of nutilda. In other thread I've read that nutilda=3*nut=nu*0.1 is that correct?
Thanks |
|
Tags |
nut nutilda |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SpalartAllmaras question | egp | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 45 | October 28, 2010 03:30 |