CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Problem: tetrahedral mesh and interFoam = bad results ?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree4Likes
  • 2 Post By querdynamik
  • 2 Post By angelmonsalve

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 4, 2010, 09:43
Default Problem: tetrahedral mesh and interFoam = bad results ?
New Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 16
querdynamik is on a distinguished road

i'm using the interFoam-solver (OF 1.6) to simulate a drop/wall-collision.

Because it is much more comfortable and time efficient (compared to blockMesh), i create the geometry and mesh with Salome. In Salome i use the "Netgen(1D,2D,3D)"-mesher to create a tetrahedral mesh.

From previous (and through experiments already validated) works, i pretty much know how the fluid-flow of the drop-impact - at least in the early phase of the simulation - should look like. In this case : The spreading wave-front has to be quiet smooth and spread nearly symmetrically in radial direction from the first point of contact between drop and wall.

When using a hexahedral mesh, the results of the simulation match the experiments pretty good.
Using a tetrahedral mesh (with approx. the same amount of cells and geometry as before) however, i get completely different and inappropriate results. The wave-front "splashes" immediatly and brakes into many little fragments.

For a better clearness, i add these two pictures from topview (both show a quarter of a droplet shortly after it touches the wall and starting to spread) :

With hexahedral mesh:

With tetrahedral mesh:

My questions are : Has someone an explanation for this discrepancy ? Is the interFoam-solver predestined for the use of hexahedral meshes ?
What could be the reasons for this numerical error?

Thanks in advance !

Best regards
lourencosm and joshmccraney like this.
querdynamik is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 10, 2015, 14:17
New Member
Angel Monsalve
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 16
angelmonsalve is on a distinguished road
Hi C.Z.

It's been a long long time since you posted this but I had a similar problem. Some time ago I was running a case using Salome in particular Netgen(1D,2D,3D) with a tetrahedral mesh.

I know that all boundary conditions and solver specifications are correct since I have other simulations done with blockMesh and analytical solutions to compare to.

Did you find any solution to this problem?
lourencosm and joshmccraney like this.
angelmonsalve is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
interFoam 1.6.x vs 1.5 : same mesh, same bc but different results nuovodna OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 9 June 14, 2010 05:45
setFields doesn't function for a tetrahedral mesh - interFoam tommie OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 5 April 15, 2010 03:32
[OpenFOAM] 'integrate variables' filter on a polyhedral mesh gives wrong results... jbf ParaView 0 September 4, 2009 04:08
Question on InterFoam moving mesh capabilities ziv OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 April 23, 2008 09:11
Convergence moving mesh lr103476 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 30 November 19, 2007 14:09

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:41.