|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Dimitris
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: München
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Hello foamers
I m currently facing a problem with my fsi application in openfoam. I ve coupled openfoam with a fem solver and problems arise when i set the moving wall velocity equal to the velocities i get from the solver. i am familiar with the added mass problems in fsi but i seriously think i am misusing the commands makeAbsolue and makeRelative. Apparently the grid is deformed with a velocity equal to the boundary. My question is: does anyone know if by using the above mentioned commands there is no longer need to explicitly set the velocities on the boundary? I m asking cause when i dont disturb them my results look quite good. |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| fluid, fsi, icofsifoam, interaction, structure |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Impinging Jet Boundary Conditions | Anindya | Main CFD Forum | 25 | February 27, 2016 13:58 |
| CFX13 Post Periodic interface | EtaEta | CFX | 7 | December 8, 2011 18:15 |
| Concentric tube heat exchanger (Air-Water) | Young | CFX | 5 | October 7, 2008 00:17 |
| how to extend FSI 2D codes to 3D, need advises | abouziar | Main CFD Forum | 1 | May 30, 2008 05:08 |
| A problem about setting boundary conditions | lyang | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 19, 1999 19:29 |