|August 23, 2012, 05:45||
What model of turbulence choose to study an external aerodynamics case
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4Rep Power: 6
I'm pretty new in cfd so maybe you'll find my questions basics. What model of turbulence choose to study an external aerodynamic case?
Here is my situation:
I want to model the aerodynamic track of a ship to investigate its effect on a helicopter during landing at the back of the ship. The wind upstream is equal to 12.85 m/s. And my Reynolds number is 10^6-10^7.
My Mesh refinement is not really good but I can't make better because of my computer. I use boundary condition type fan to model the helicopter's rotor.
Until Today I use standard K-Epsilon (High Re) model to perform my calcul but now I'm more experienced and I believe I should use K-Omega SST model. I try to use K-Omega SST model but my results are completely different and it seems that the results are less consistent than for the standard K-Epsilon model. Is it normal?
EDIT: I used simpleFoam to compare the 2 models of turbulence.
Please can you give me your opinion? Maybe I should try an another model of turbulence like K-epsilon (Low Re)
It's been 2 months since I have worked on the standard k-Epsilon model and and I do not need to have a good accuracy for my results. I just want the good behavior of the air. The standard K-Epsilon I used is it enough?
Last edited by raffale; August 24, 2012 at 04:16.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Fluent :- turbulence Model||prince_pahariaa||FLUENT||9||May 20, 2016 03:41|
|Is Playstation 3 cluster suitable for CFD work||hsieh||OpenFOAM||9||August 16, 2015 14:53|
|SimpleFoam case with SpalartAllmaras turbulence model implemented||nedved||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||2||November 30, 2014 23:43|
|Wrong calculation of nut in the kOmegaSST turbulence model||FelixL||OpenFOAM Bugs||27||March 27, 2012 09:02|
|Why Turbulence models are not universal.||Senthil||Main CFD Forum||4||July 5, 2000 04:34|