|
[Sponsors] |
February 2, 2017, 20:29 |
about fvSchemes with tetramesh
|
#1 |
Member
bye bye my blue
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 8 |
div(phi,U) bounded Gauss linearUpwind grad(U);
div(phi,U) gauss linear; the difference of these schemes is order (1st or 2nd). because of this, solutions (result of 2 schemes) can be different?? bounded's velocity profile is more accurate gauss linear. Is it acceptable?? p.s) can i use bounded Gauss linearUpwind grad(U); on unsteady? Last edited by bye bye my blue; February 2, 2017 at 21:55. Reason: just modifying |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
using fvc::interpolate without fvSchemes / manually prescribe interpolation schemes | linch | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 5 | March 20, 2018 05:49 |
First order in fvSchemes does not seem to work | gerritgroot | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | September 30, 2015 20:06 |
Unrealistic values in cells at edge (high pressure & velocity) - fvSchemes?! | matzbanni | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | August 24, 2015 16:46 |
Change fvSchemes on the Fly with Script | Boudgoust | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | April 30, 2015 12:33 |
fvschemes and fvsolutions in MRFSimpleFoam | renyun0511 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 23 | August 3, 2011 04:07 |