CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM

NASA rotor 37

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree3Likes
  • 3 Post By hjasak

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 18, 2018, 06:32
Question NASA rotor 37
  #1
New Member
 
Tom
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 3
tom.opt is on a distinguished road
Hi All,
I'm currently trying to simulate NASA rotor 37 in rhoSimpleFoam with k-omega SST Model.

I've had several goes at it but every time my model crashes after a few thousand iterations.
I tried Mass flow inlet and static pressure outlet as well as total pressure inlet and static pressure outlet but both have failed.
Has anyone managed to successfully simulate rotor 37 or rotor 67 in OpenFOAM?

If yes, could you please share the boundary condition files you used or give me some hints

many thanks,
Tom
tom.opt is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 18, 2018, 21:35
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,826
Rep Power: 27
hjasak will become famous soon enough
Hi,

Have a look at:

Josip Žužul: Numerical evaluation of the performance curve for the NASA rotor 67, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, 2017

on my CFD research group web site

https://foam-extend.fsb.hr/dissemina...tudent-thesis/

There is also a direct download link for the Thesis in English with an extended abstract in Croatian:

http://foam-extend.fsb.hr/wp-content...aster_2017.pdf

Hope this helps,

Hrv
student666, tom.opt and tjuAeron like this.
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak
Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk
hjasak is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 19, 2018, 05:55
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Tom
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 3
tom.opt is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by hjasak View Post
Hi,

Have a look at:

Josip Žužul: Numerical evaluation of the performance curve for the NASA rotor 67, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, 2017

on my CFD research group web site

https://foam-extend.fsb.hr/dissemina...tudent-thesis/

There is also a direct download link for the Thesis in English with an extended abstract in Croatian:

http://foam-extend.fsb.hr/wp-content...aster_2017.pdf

Hope this helps,

Hrv
This is great thanks.
I just managed to compile the extended version and am going through the tutorials.

Last edited by tom.opt; June 20, 2018 at 06:43.
tom.opt is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 4, 2018, 05:20
Unhappy
  #4
New Member
 
Tom
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 3
tom.opt is on a distinguished road
has anyone ever managed to do rotor 37 in OpenFoam I wonder?
I've already been struggling for over a month with little luck.
Perhaps the solver can't cope with this geometry/flow.
tom.opt is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 3, 2018, 05:37
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Stéphan AUBIN
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 2
stephan_aubin is on a distinguished road
Hi to all
I am also interested in running a rotor67 to learn compressible rotating openFOAM.
Tom > did you succeed ?
Stéphan
stephan_aubin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 3, 2018, 12:42
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Tom
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 3
tom.opt is on a distinguished road
Hi Stephane,
I have not managed to get a satisfactory result with the current version of OpenFoam.
I'm afraid that for rotor 37 the problem was that mass doesn't conserve when using periodic boundaries. I tried with both the regular and extended edition.
I suggest trying to simulare a full annulus mesh if you want to do rotor 37 ,if you have the computational power.
The rotor 67 test case is slightly easier to mesh and simulate, I suggest you have a look at the above referenced paper. It is quite good
tom.opt is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 4, 2018, 03:19
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Stéphan AUBIN
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 2
stephan_aubin is on a distinguished road
Dear Tom
Thanks for your inputs.

Frankly, Rotor37 is a must to validate compressible turbomachines. It is well documented and works on all the industrial solvers...

Wandering on the forum I found some info about the works done by Matvey Kraposhin, a member of this group.
I tried to contact him at it appears he has a good compressible MRF solution that also works for low Mach Numbers...

I keep you posted !

Stéphan
stephan_aubin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 4, 2018, 06:52
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Tom
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 3
tom.opt is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan_aubin View Post
Dear Tom
Thanks for your inputs.

Frankly, Rotor37 is a must to validate compressible turbomachines. It is well documented and works on all the industrial solvers...

Wandering on the forum I found some info about the works done by Matvey Kraposhin, a member of this group.
I tried to contact him at it appears he has a good compressible MRF solution that also works for low Mach Numbers...

I keep you posted !

Stéphan
Thanks,
if you managed to get rotor 37 validated in openfoam please let me know.
I need to get this testcase running so I can test some flow control models.

Tom
tom.opt is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 4, 2018, 07:15
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Stéphan AUBIN
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 2
stephan_aubin is on a distinguished road
OK !!
I will no problem !
Stéphan
stephan_aubin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 13, 2018, 10:05
Default
  #10
New Member
 
Tom
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 3
tom.opt is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan_aubin View Post
OK !!
I will no problem !
Stéphan
Hi,
have you managed to make any progress on rotor 37 ?

Tom
tom.opt is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 13, 2018, 12:05
Default
  #11
New Member
 
Stéphan AUBIN
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 2
stephan_aubin is on a distinguished road
Dear Tom
no but because I haven’t had the time to work on it.
thans for asking!
Stéphan
stephan_aubin is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
nasa 67, openfoam, rhosimplefoam, rotor37

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Multiphase flow - incorrect velocity on inlet Mike_Tom CFX 6 September 29, 2016 01:27
Ansys CFX problem: unexpected very high temperatures in premix laminar combustion faizan_habib7 CFX 4 February 1, 2016 17:00
Error in Two phase (condensation) modeling adilsyyed CFX 15 June 24, 2015 19:42
Segmentation fault in running alternateSteadyReactingFoam,why? NewKid OpenFOAM 18 January 20, 2011 16:55
NASA Format Stone CFX 2 February 7, 2006 10:17


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:28.