|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Zander Meiring
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 125
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Good day all,
I am using the simpleFoam solver with a Newtonian transport model, where only kinematic viscosity is needed (nu). After solving, my main point of consideration is pressures, which is by default given as P/rho. I am working with air at 15C so nu = 1.47e-5 mu = 1.802e-5 rho = 1.225 Would there be any negative consequence to changing the properties such that I set rho = 1, and therefore use a nu = 1.802e-5? This would mean that my pressures don't need to be multiplied by density, but I am unsure if this would cause differences in regards to the turbulence models when computing turbulent viscosity. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Henrik Johansson
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Gothenburg
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
Hi Zander,
Density is not solved with simpleFoam. The effect of density is as you said pressure(in OpenFoam) = P/rho. Thus your indata for pressure shall be P divided by density of your fluid. Changing density to 1 would be unphysical if you are trying to solve air at 15C.
__________________
/ Henrik Johansson |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Getting divergence while increasing the back pressure at pressure outlet | greenfields15 | FLUENT | 0 | March 19, 2018 00:39 |
| reversed flow at pressure inlet and turbulent viscosity is limited.... | cfdiscool | FLUENT | 10 | June 10, 2015 07:15 |
| interFoam: strange pressure with high fluid viscosity? | ckroener | OpenFOAM | 3 | April 7, 2010 13:51 |
| Neumann pressure BC and velocity field | Antech | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 25, 2006 03:15 |
| what the result is negatif pressure at inlet | chong chee nan | FLUENT | 0 | December 29, 2001 06:13 |