|
[Sponsors] |
April 19, 2024, 05:29 |
OpenFOAM vs other codes?
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2024
Location: France
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 2 |
Hello openFOAM community!
I am new to openFOAM. I used to used Gerris (10 years ago) and my former colleagues in Paris now use Basilisk (its successor). I believe both codes are Volume Finite (?), what would say the big differences are between the two codes (Basilisks and OpenFOAM). I aim to study systems with non-Newtonian rheology and in some cases two-phase systems with Marangoni and dissolution processes. What would be the most appropriate and easy to use? Thank you for your advice and clemency in asking this question. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to contribute to the community of OpenFOAM users and to the OpenFOAM technology | wyldckat | OpenFOAM | 17 | November 10, 2017 15:54 |
OpenFOAM Training, London, Chicago, Munich, Sep-Oct 2015 | cfd.direct | OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources | 2 | August 31, 2015 13:36 |
Suggestion for a new sub-forum at OpenFOAM's Forum | wyldckat | Site Help, Feedback & Discussions | 20 | October 28, 2014 09:04 |
Cross-compiling OpenFOAM 1.7.0 on Linux for Windows 32 and 64bits with Mingw-w64 | wyldckat | OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources | 3 | September 8, 2010 06:25 |
Modified OpenFOAM Forum Structure and New Mailing-List | pete | Site News & Announcements | 0 | June 29, 2009 05:56 |