 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
parallel results different depending on decomposition strategy |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 3, 2009, 10:52
|
parallel results different depending on decomposition strategy
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Francesco
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 16  |
hello,
I performed a simulation using simpleFoam and for different parallelization strategies: number of processors, simple/hierarchical/... I get slightly different results. Is there anyone which knows it is ok, or if there is any problem. The difference seems to be small (more or less 1% on drag coefficient for the stationary solution). Where is the part depending on the decomposition method? thanks a lot, Francesco |
|
|
|
|
| Tags |
| error, parallel, results, simplefoam |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Different Results from Fluent 5.5 and Fluent 6.0 | Rajeev Kumar Singh | FLUENT | 6 | December 19, 2010 11:33 |
| MPICH Parallel Run Error on the Windows Server2003 | Saturn | CFX | 3 | August 29, 2006 08:42 |
| results with parallel processing | Muhammad Shakaib | Main CFD Forum | 1 | December 29, 2005 00:56 |
| CFX-5.7 MPICH Parallel Problem (Output of Results) | James Date | CFX | 7 | February 15, 2005 16:03 |
| parallel mode - small problem? | co2 | FLUENT | 2 | June 1, 2004 23:47 |
Threaded Mode
