|November 25, 2009, 08:20||
low reynolds k omega / wall functions
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 34Rep Power: 9
I make my first steps with low-Reynolds models for heat transfer analysis.
When I understand the new wall function approach in OF 1.6. correctly, I “simply” can switch off the wall functions e.g. by using “calculated” in the nut-file and some reasonable bcs for omega and k at the walls. I build some test cases with grids of y+ below “1” and used fixed values for k (I used very low non-zero values) and zero gradient for omega. Does this make sense? But the convergence is quite poor and the results (e.g. when I estimate wallShear stresses from different models) differ strongly. Any hints or recommendations?
I also read that Fluent uses a low Reynolds correction for the k-omega model. Did anybody implement something like this in OF or compared the effect?
Thanks in advance
|March 30, 2011, 06:04||
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 168Rep Power: 8
" fixed values for k (I used very low non-zero values) and zero gradient for omega. Does this make sense?"
Fixed values for k which are non-zero but low are good but zero gradient for omega does not make sense.
Have a look at the post
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Low Reynolds Number Instability in icoFoam - Cavity Case||kmooney||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||2||October 8, 2009 14:09|
|"OF uses logarithmic wall functions always" - does it changed in 1.6?||yuhai||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||2||September 17, 2009 12:16|
|LES with wall functions, wall boundary, Re 10000||subba||CFX||4||July 10, 2007 05:04|
|Wall functions||Confused||Main CFD Forum||1||August 14, 1998 09:31|
|Wall functions or low-Re models?||J. P.||Main CFD Forum||7||July 9, 1998 11:11|