
[Sponsors] 
December 3, 2010, 10:32 
a problem about steady state solver

#1 
Member
chenkai
Join Date: May 2010
Location: munich
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 9 
Sponsored Links
I have three problems when I use rhoSimpleFoam. 1. Is the relaxationFactors only used for steady state solver? And how much I should choose them. e.g. In my case when I choose the relaxationFactors for rho bigger than 0.1, the result will not converge. But why? 2. Another problem about the Courant Number. For the steady state solver, do I need to also consider the courant number? 3. And I want to calculate the mean velocity and density of the inlet and oulet of a channel. Anyone who know how can I calculate it? Directly in ParaView or use other functions? Thanks a lot! Last edited by xck1986; December 3, 2010 at 10:51. 

Sponsored Links 
December 3, 2010, 11:27 

#2 
New Member
Diego Villa
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Genova Italy
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 9 
Hi
For the first question, also some unsteady solver use the relaxation factor but in a different way, because normally they use its in the inner iteration but not in the last one (see PimpleFoam). Normally the relaxation factor should be closer to 1 but for a steady solution as the rhoSimpleFoam the value could be smaller to stabilize the solution. The results at the end should be not affected to the value, only the velocity of the convergence. I normally see that if the case blow up could be due to the mesh or the turbulent parameter. For the second question the Courant Number is valid only for a unsteady solution in that case the solution is steady. For the third I'm not an expert but I think you can do that in Paraview I hope to be helpful. 

December 3, 2010, 12:07 

#3  
Member
chenkai
Join Date: May 2010
Location: munich
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 9 
Quote:
Hi Villa, thanks a lot for your explain. Is that means, not matter which relaxation factor I have chosen, it has no influence on the final results? The only things is that if it can help to reach convergence or not? And another question: can I use a transient solver to solve a steady state problem? 

December 3, 2010, 12:17 

#4 
Senior Member
Bernhard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Delft
Posts: 790
Rep Power: 14 
Wrt 3.
You can add something like this in your ControlDict. I assume it is selfexplanatory for you. Code:
functions { massFlow { type patchAverage; functionObjectLibs ( "libsimpleFunctionObjects.so" ); verbose true; patches ( inlet outlet ); fields ( U ); factor 1.; } } 

December 3, 2010, 16:09 

#5 
New Member
Diego Villa
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Genova Italy
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 9 
Yes you can solve all steady problem with a transient solver, you must wait the end of the transition... but normally that needs more computational time, in fact exist some steady solver that use a virtual time marching approach. Like Star..


December 3, 2010, 17:36 

#6  
Member
chenkai
Join Date: May 2010
Location: munich
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 9 
Quote:
Thanks a lot for you useful sugguestion!! 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Problem with Gmsh  nishant_hull  Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ...  23  August 5, 2015 02:09 
About surface weighed average  anne  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  1  July 6, 2010 15:06 
Recover surface from surface mesh in IcemCFD  Jerry Tanner  CFX  0  August 20, 2008 12:48 
BC for free surface  pilar  FLUENT  3  January 14, 2004 08:36 
free convection heat transfer from a heated horizontal surface through a liquid to a thin cooled fin  Kaushik  FLUENT  1  May 8, 2000 06:47 
Sponsored Links 