# Question on the discretization of momentum equation in icoFoam

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read October 3, 2011, 02:25 Question on the discretization of momentum equation in icoFoam #1 New Member   Oliver Pasqual Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 13 Rep Power: 13 Dear foamers, I have a puzzle in the discretization of momentum equation in icoFoam. As we know, the momentum equation was integrated over the control volume, and then discretized into linear equation. When I dig into the code detail term by term of the UEqn, I found that the left hand part of the equation(fvm::ddt(U) + fvm::div(phi,U) - fvm::laplacian(nu,U)) was integrated and then the coefficient of unknow variables were added into the matrix A. None of the terms is divided by the control volume..... code detail of fvm::ddt using Euler scheme: Code: ```template tmp > EulerDdtScheme::fvmDdt ( const GeometricField& vf ) { tmp > tfvm ( new fvMatrix ( vf, vf.dimensions()*dimVol/dimTime ) ); fvMatrix& fvm = tfvm(); scalar rDeltaT = 1.0/mesh().time().deltaTValue(); fvm.diag() = rDeltaT*mesh().V(); if (mesh().moving()) { fvm.source() = rDeltaT*vf.oldTime().internalField()*mesh().V0(); } else { fvm.source() = rDeltaT*vf.oldTime().internalField()*mesh().V(); } return tfvm; }``` To the right hand part of the momentum equation, first we integrate the term(fvc::div(p)) over the entire CV. then it was discretized using the Gauss law. But the result was divided by the volume of the current grid. code detail of fvc::grad(p) using GraussGrand: Code: ```Foam::fv::gaussGrad::gradf ( const GeometricField& ssf, const word& name ) { typedef typename outerProduct::type GradType; const fvMesh& mesh = ssf.mesh(); tmp > tgGrad ( new GeometricField ( IOobject ( name, ssf.instance(), mesh, IOobject::NO_READ, IOobject::NO_WRITE ), mesh, dimensioned ( "0", ssf.dimensions()/dimLength, pTraits::zero ), zeroGradientFvPatchField::typeName ) ); GeometricField& gGrad = tgGrad(); const labelUList& owner = mesh.owner(); const labelUList& neighbour = mesh.neighbour(); const vectorField& Sf = mesh.Sf(); Field& igGrad = gGrad; const Field& issf = ssf; forAll(owner, facei) { GradType Sfssf = Sf[facei]*issf[facei]; igGrad[owner[facei]] += Sfssf; igGrad[neighbour[facei]] -= Sfssf; } forAll(mesh.boundary(), patchi) { const labelUList& pFaceCells = mesh.boundary()[patchi].faceCells(); const vectorField& pSf = mesh.Sf().boundaryField()[patchi]; const fvsPatchField& pssf = ssf.boundaryField()[patchi]; forAll(mesh.boundary()[patchi], facei) { igGrad[pFaceCells[facei]] += pSf[facei]*pssf[facei]; } } igGrad /= mesh.V(); gGrad.correctBoundaryConditions(); return tgGrad; }``` so my puzzle is that: the right hand part of U equation was divided by the volume, but the left part was not ... the left hand part must be also divied by the volume in some place, but I can't figure it out... any hint will be highly appreciated. thanks M.P J Last edited by MPJ; October 3, 2011 at 09:26.   October 3, 2011, 10:49 #2 New Member   Oliver Pasqual Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 13 Rep Power: 13 perhaps the problem has not been discribed clearly....... as we know, all the term of the momentum equation must be divided by the cell volumes, when dig into the detail of the code implementation, only the R.H.S of U equation was divided by the volume in the discretization process of fvc::grad(p). How about the L.H.S of the equation? From the discretization process of fvm::, all the term were integrated over the entire volume. I can't find the code on the division operation for them terms .... can somebody give any suggestion? thanks.   October 4, 2011, 02:49 #3 Senior Member   Elvis Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sindelfingen, Germany Posts: 618 Blog Entries: 6 Rep Power: 22 Hello, have you read http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/IcoFoam ? hope that gets you further   October 4, 2011, 09:44 #4
New Member

Oliver Pasqual
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 13 Quote:
 Originally Posted by elvis Hello, have you read http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/IcoFoam ? hope that gets you further

I am new to OF.
I have read the the detail discription of icoFoam several times.
A long time's debug found that the secret lies in the operation overloading of fvMatrix.
and now I am more clear about the discretization of equations using the language of OpenFOAM.

thanks
M.P J  Thread Tools Search this Thread Show Printable Version Email this Page Search this Thread: Advanced Search Display Modes Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Sas CFX 15 July 13, 2010 08:56 Hooman Main CFD Forum 2 June 6, 2010 08:30 Demonwolf Main CFD Forum 2 October 29, 2009 19:53 jbambery Main CFD Forum 1 June 9, 2006 13:27 S. Wang Main CFD Forum 3 March 2, 2001 13:44

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:06.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Privacy Statement - Top