3.6vs3.5 HOCS convergence -- CFD Online Discussion Forums

April 29, 2005, 10:59	3.6vs3.5 HOCS convergence	#1
tnorton Guest Posts: n/a	Hello Everybody, I can't get convergence with any of the higher order convection schemes with v3.6 in low-speed flows around buildings. Is there a problem with the code or is it just me? I have relaxation tightened appropriately and v3.5 will converge perfectly with these parameters. I just can't see what is wrong. I would use 3.5 only I need to use some new options in 3.6flair. If anyone is interested, try to converge the (small) library case v407 with HOCS. Please englighten me Kind Regards

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
URF and convergence in natural convergence	Marie-Anne	Main CFD Forum	11	September 11, 2009 10:07
P-1 convergence	dan	FLUENT	0	March 3, 2006 14:10
convergence	vijay	FLUENT	6	February 1, 2006 03:04
convergence	vijay	Main CFD Forum	1	January 30, 2006 13:13
too bad convergence	Davoche	Main CFD Forum	2	November 20, 2005 05:08

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:19.