|
[Sponsors] |
How to use "densit.f" for multicomponent case? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 3, 2004, 02:30 |
How to use "densit.f" for multicomponent case?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, everybody. My case is transient, 3 scalars(active), compressible problem. As I know, "Ideal f(T,P)" option is not valid in my case. And "Multicomponent" option is not valid because the background gas density is constant. So I determined using user subroutine("densit.f"). How do I code this subroutine?
|
|
March 3, 2004, 03:15 |
Re: How to use "densit.f" for multicomponent case?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If your fluid is a mixture of active scalars (and perhaps a background fluid), and each scalar behaves as an ideal gas, then the correct option for density is "Ideal f(T,p)". Look at equation (1-35) of the v3.15 Methodology Manual - "Ideal gases or mixtures thereof". You don't need to use densit.f.
|
|
March 3, 2004, 07:06 |
Re: How to use "densit.f" for multicomponent case?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thank you very much, Richard.
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"""Source Term in UDS""" | Sebeci | FLUENT | 6 | April 16, 2003 12:46 |
Difference between "multicomponent" and "Homogeneo | David George | CFX | 1 | September 18, 2002 23:13 |
DIFFER IN "RESULT" AND "Q1" | Baizhong | Phoenics | 1 | December 9, 2001 09:41 |
"laminar" incomp. N-S eqs. for "turbulent" flows | wowakai | Main CFD Forum | 4 | November 27, 2001 05:48 |
what's the difference between "successive substitution" and "segregated" solutions?? | wai | Main CFD Forum | 1 | December 28, 1998 09:24 |