|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Good day
I'm very interested in what manner STAR-CD interpolates the pressure values at the cell faces Any suggestions or references will be highly appreciated Daria |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
As far as I remember, 2nd order central differencing is used.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks
And for interpolating face velocity in continuity equation - a face momentum equation is used? Or I`m not right? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Actually, there is no such thing. As far as I reckon (please anybody corrects me), the face velocities are not used in the continuity (or in this case the "pressure" equation) but rather the mass fluxes. These are evaluated in the same way as in the momentum equation in order to have a consistent discretization practice.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
As I understand, if mass fluxes in "pressure equation" is interpolated in usual way (linear interpolation of cell-centered velocities to the face), then so called checker-boarding of pressure may occur (in other words - oscillations)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Of course, but there is a special procedure implemented (also known as Rhie & Chow correction) to get rid of this problem
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks
But I wonder, if for interpolating mass fluxes Rhie and Chow procedure is used, why for interpolating pressure in momentum equation the 2nd order central differencing scheme (as you wrote) is implemented? What is in this case with checker-boarding ? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I think there is some kind of misunderstanding here. In the mass conservation equation which degenerates in the case of incompressible flow into a Laplace equation on pressure, the pressure stencil uses second-order differencing. For consistency, the mass fluxes are evaluated in the same way they are evaluated in the momentum equations. Then, for avoiding the checkerboard patterns on pressure, you have an additional term based on the Rhie&Chow procedure. This is mandatory when you use a colocated arrangement of variables.
I hope this is clearer now. For more details, I would suggest to read the book by Ferziger & Peric: "Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics". |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks a lot!
I understand, that for Laplace equation the second-order differencing is used. But what scheme is used for pressure in momentum equation in STAR-CD? Thank you for the book recommended! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Gauss' theorem with pressure at the face centers, hence second-order interpolation as in the mass conservation equation (for consistency).
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Which interpolation scheme is used for velocity | Chen Fangzhi | FLUENT | 1 | July 27, 2015 15:53 |
Where exactly to set up interpolation scheme | ceyrows | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | April 4, 2008 09:48 |
Deciphering interpolation scheme implementation | alberto | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | March 13, 2008 21:18 |
Spray interpolation scheme | chris1980 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | June 16, 2006 13:58 |
CAVITATION (pressure interpolation scheme)!? | ROOZBEH | FLUENT | 0 | March 3, 2004 03:26 |