CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

Hypersonic Viscous

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 1, 2013, 05:40
Default Hypersonic Viscous
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 13
h.jaz is on a distinguished road

I am currently using star CCM+ to model Hypersonic Flow. I used for the inviscid case and it was alright although few problems were encoutered regarding the stability of the solver which needed fine tunning of the courant number.

However, when I added viscoucity to the model the (and chose turbulent flow in my physics model). I get a floating point exception error straight away (after 2-4 iterations)?

Does any one know whether Star CCM+ can solve viscous (turbulent) Hypersonic flow? If it can do then how can I get rid of the floating point error?

Also, Do you know If the stability of the solver is an inherent problem with Star CCM+ hypersonic solver (ASUM+ FVS)?

h.jaz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 1, 2013, 13:39
Melih Meriç
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 15
mmntmflx is on a distinguished road
Which version do you use of STAR-CCM+?
And i worked at 1,2,4,6 mach numbers around a bullet-like geometry and i dont see that kind of error.. There is no solver problem i think.. did you try other turbulent models? Spalart-Almaras can you try?
mmntmflx is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 6, 2013, 06:54
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 13
h.jaz is on a distinguished road

Thanks for your reply.

I am using Star-CCM+7.06.009.

Can I ask how you modelling the flow around the bullet like geometry? i.e. How big is your fluid block around the body? what mesh base size are you using relative to a characteristic length of the body? what is the distance you left between the base and the end of the fluid block?

Moreover, Can I ask you whether you know how to set a "continuative" boundary condition at the outlet? Because I expect my outlet flow to remain supersonic? I am currently say that the boundary at the outlet is a "pressure outlet" which I believe could be wrong modelling because I am specifying pressure on outlet to be free stream pressure.

By continuative I mean set the pressure at the outlet to be the same as the pressure corresponding to the previous cell.

Or are u aware of a suitable boundary of the outlet?

Moreover, still for the inviscid case I struggle to get good convergence in the Y & Z momentum, can you suggest how to solve this?

Your help is much appreciated.

h.jaz is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Viscous resistance coefficients in porous medium fpingqian FLUENT 50 June 26, 2019 01:55
Linearization of viscous flux in discontinuous Galerkin finite element methods yidongxia Main CFD Forum 1 November 17, 2011 12:11
adapt viscous resistance based on velocity / UDF Häwimeddel FLUENT 2 April 20, 2009 10:08
viscous effects in hypersonic flow (at high Re no) VVJ Main CFD Forum 1 November 20, 2007 08:35
VISCOUS heat dissipation Joseph CFX 0 October 1, 2004 08:52

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:31.