CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

Method I used to monitor wave elevation time history at some certain place in ccm+

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 25, 2013, 07:33
Default Method I used to monitor wave elevation time history at some certain place in ccm+
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 8
dai549592484 is on a distinguished road
I noticed that some star ccm+ users don't know how to monitor wave elevation time history at some certain place in the wave field. And there was one way to get an approximated data: create a point wave probe attached to the free surface and measure the position of that point, however, the result is not that good.( You can compare this method with the way I used.)

Let's first assume the positive Z axis in upward and positve X axis is along the wave propagating direction. Then you will need to:
1)create a plane section (derived part) normal to y axis, use the whole domain as the input.
2)select the plane section just created as the input and create a plane section normal to x axis, then you will get an intersection of the two plane sections which is a line (will be named plane section 2 if you have not create any other plane section before the 1 one)
3) create a line integral report, select the line as the part and choose volume of fraction>water in the field function.
4)create a monitor and plot for that report.

The result you will get is the wave elevation time history plus the water depth since it integraled the vof water along the line from the start point of the line to the end. So you can either create an expression report, call the line integral report and minus water depth or simply post prossess it via excel.

P.S: don't use the line probe build in star ccm+ to do so since the line probe built in has limitaion of integral I guess. (I've failed in doing so)
dai549592484 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 4, 2015, 00:22
Default Thanks David
New Member
freeday's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 9
freeday is on a distinguished road
I have tried your way to make a report of wave elevation. Previously, I use field function of Centroid [Z] of cross section between iso-surface of volume fraction and plane normal to x. But, my graph is look steps.
Thank a lot.
freeday is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
High Courant Number @ icoFoam Artex85 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 11 February 16, 2017 14:40
pimpleFoam: turbulence->correct(); is not executed when using residualControl hfs OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 October 29, 2013 09:35
pisoFoam with k-epsilon turb blows up - Some questions Heroic OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 26 December 17, 2012 04:34
Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History Abhi Main CFD Forum 12 July 8, 2002 09:11
Physical Reason for stability of Implicit Schemes? radhakrishnan Main CFD Forum 25 December 7, 2000 16:25

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:19.