|
[Sponsors] |
May 6, 2015, 14:38 |
Initial conditions: Definition of k
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 160
Rep Power: 11 |
Hello,
I don't understand why in initial conditions the definition of k is: k , where v is the turbulent velocity scale instead of: k , where is the velocity initial guess What does turbulent velocity mean exactly ? Is that the velocity at which the turbulent eddy turns ? If yes, it doesn't represent the same velocity that averaged flow-field, isn't it ? |
|
May 6, 2015, 15:23 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Matt
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 947
Rep Power: 17 |
No. You are over complicating it.
The turbulent velocity scale is just some characteristic velocity of your flow. Most commonly an inlet velocity or freestream velocity. Something that helps scale the turbulence parameters for your initial conditions and is representative of your flow in a global sense. |
|
May 6, 2015, 17:35 |
|
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 160
Rep Power: 11 |
I'm not sure I understand very well because in options of initial conditions there are two velocities that we have to need ... ''Turbulent Velocity Scale'' and ''Velocity'' so these are two different velocities , isn't it ? Or ''Turbulent Velocity Scale'' must correspond to inlet velocity magnitude ?
Quote:
|
||
May 6, 2015, 17:52 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Matt
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 947
Rep Power: 17 |
You don't have to have the same velocity defined for both. They can (and in most cases probably should) be the same, but they let you be flexible. With the velocity value you are actually setting your initial velocity everywhere in your domain. With the turbulent velocity scale you are just giving the turbulence model a way to estimate its initial inputs given the way you chose to specify your turbulence. Basically, it will go and calculate k and e (for k-e model) given your intensity and length scale, or whatever values you define. You aren't actually setting the velocity with this value, just helping the turbulence model calculate your initial values for k and e.
Make sense? |
|
July 10, 2015, 23:19 |
|
#5 | |
New Member
Andre C
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 12 |
Quote:
|
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
transsonic nozzle with rhoSimpleFoam | Unseen | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | July 1, 2022 06:54 |
Floating point exception error | Alan | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 11 | July 1, 2021 21:51 |
a problem with convergence in buoyantSimpleFoam | skuznet | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | November 15, 2017 12:12 |
Upgraded from Karmic Koala 9.10 to Lucid Lynx10.04.3 | bookie56 | OpenFOAM Installation | 8 | August 13, 2011 04:03 |
Unknown error | sivakumar | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 9 | September 9, 2008 12:53 |