CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

Interface between two directed meshes

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By marmot

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 5, 2016, 12:09
Default Interface between two directed meshes
  #1
New Member
 
Christoph Hachmann
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 10
Chris_2002 is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I am simulating a rotor applying a momentum sink to a flow. I've used the Directed Mesh option for the rotor disk and trimmed cells for the fluid. I included a buffer zone, also with a directed mesh, between the rotor and the fluid in an attempt to improve the solution near the boundary between a region with momentum sink term and the rest of the domain without momentum sink term, see image 1.

However, when doing so I get spots along the interface where the streamwise velocity is virtually 0, see second image. Where does this come from and how can I get rid of it?

I've looked into the interpolation between Parts Meshes but a change to higher-order stencils didn't change the result.

It'd be great to hear from anyone who might have a solution to this.

Thanks!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Mesh_Disk1Plane.jpg (197.9 KB, 31 views)
File Type: jpg Velocity_Disk1Plane.jpg (36.5 KB, 21 views)
Chris_2002 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 9, 2016, 10:07
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
kevin alun
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 106
Rep Power: 14
marmot is on a distinguished road
This could be due to the interface not being 100% matched, you can increase the tolerance when creating the interface to improve matching.

When you create an interface you have a parent and child boundary, switch the parent boundary to symmetry than the unmatched surfaces will have a velocity, could be they are wall now.
Chris_2002 likes this.
marmot is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 9, 2016, 10:35
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Christoph Hachmann
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 10
Chris_2002 is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I also got in contact with CD-adapco and it turns out that there was a problem with the interpolation. However, this was not on the simulation/meshing side but rather on the plotting side. I chose the "smooth filled" option for the contour plot which uses an interpolation to smooth the contours. This interpolation can cause spurious effects. When I changed it to "filled" it looked perfectly normal and as expected.

So I think it's safe to say solution found.
Chris_2002 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Radiation in semi-transparent media with surface-to-surface model? mpeppels CFX 11 August 22, 2019 07:30
Low torque values on Screw Turbine Shaun Waters CFX 34 July 23, 2015 08:16
GETVAR Error in Multiband Monte Carlo Radiation Simulation with Directional Source silvan CFX 3 June 16, 2014 09:49
Interface w. Pitch Change: Thcfd CFX 0 December 22, 2010 03:50
meshes interface ? amine CFX 1 March 7, 2008 13:42


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:18.