|
[Sponsors] |
Modeling the gas flow through the packed bed of DEM particles |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 12, 2018, 09:43 |
Modeling the gas flow through the packed bed of DEM particles
|
#1 |
New Member
Dmitry
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ukraine
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 8 |
Hi everyone!
I'm modeling the gas flow through the packed bed layers of 2 types of DEM particles. The model is a blast furnace in 2D representation. Packed bed generates with DEM model. Flow solver is freezing during DEM iteraction. Then flow solver is unfeezed and start the flow through the packed bed of DEM particles. During the solution i have some problems and questions: 1. During the solution, I do not see the resistance of the layer of particles to the gas flow. Thу drag force model (i chose Schiller-Naumann model) and two-way coupling model is activated for all lagrangian phases. I make the experiment without DEM particles and got the same velocity fields. 2. How can i speed up the solution? Аfter the formation of a layer, can the DEM solver be frozen? If i freeze the DEM solver after several timesteps particles leave solution domain. I hope you will help me! |
|
October 17, 2018, 08:29 |
|
#2 | ||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
More info on problem is recommended. Like some rough sketch, physics models etc. |
|||
October 17, 2018, 10:58 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Dmitry
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ukraine
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 8 |
For a greater understanding of the problem i attach the model files. You can get them by downloading for the following link https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ue...1JzbgKai3svLqY
File "BlastFurnace_DEM_1@07570.sim" have some intermediate resualts. On the vector scene you can see the lack of resistance to the gas flow of the particle layer. |
|
October 18, 2018, 10:41 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Dmitry
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ukraine
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 8 |
Here is the picture after freezing the DEM solver with unreal velocities. This is the small 3D model in which i applied coupled flow solver. The lagrangian spec on walls is DEM mode.
|
|
June 14, 2022, 13:19 |
Did you find a solution?
|
#5 |
New Member
Cassian
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 4 |
This is also an issue I am facing. With the two way coupling on, my particles end up breaking through the domain wall.
This may be late but did you find a solution to your problem? |
|
July 7, 2023, 06:24 |
|
#6 |
Member
Mahmoud
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 6 |
||
January 17, 2024, 09:58 |
|
#7 |
Member
André Luiz Moura Silva Moreira
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Brazil
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 11 |
Did you try to reduce the Young Modulus?
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to simulate particles in a gas flow | sara | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 13 | October 8, 2019 06:12 |
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out | saii | CFX | 12 | March 19, 2018 06:21 |
error message | cuteapathy | CFX | 14 | March 20, 2012 07:45 |
fluid flow fundas | ram | Main CFD Forum | 5 | June 17, 2000 22:31 |
Hydrostatic pressure in 2-phase flow modeling (long) | DS & HB | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 8, 2000 16:00 |