CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

Poor surface resolution caused by volume shapes

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 23, 2011, 06:34
Default Poor surface resolution caused by volume shapes
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 14
Philipp Dietrich is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I am a beginner to CFD and StarCCM+

Currently I am trying to simulate the flow around an airfoil.
I use the "trimmer" and "prism layers" around the airfoil for meshing.
When I just create a mesh with refinement close to the airfoil structure the mesh is just fine.

But, when I define a "volume shape" (block) in order to create a finer mesh around the trailing edge, for example, StarCCM+ kind of destroys the geometry of the airfoil.
The round parts of the geometry get approximated roughly by secants. That results, when a simulation is applied, in pressure jumps at the so generated edges.

Can anyone tell me, why this happens? I just included this one "volume shape" and stick to the other settings. Is there a way to force StarCCM+ to follow the exact geometry, when "volume shapes" are applied?

Any help would be much appreciated.

Philipp
Philipp Dietrich is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 26, 2011, 16:21
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 636
Rep Power: 21
abdul099 is on a distinguished road
Can you please post a picture of the destroyed surface? Do you set mesh values on boundaries while using the volumetric control? What values do you set in the VC and on the boundaries? What file type do you use for import? Working on parts level or regions level?

Usually CCM+ doesn't destroy a geometry just because it's Monday. There has to be a specific reason, and is has to do something with your settings, as my airfoil simulations usually went fine.
Give us more input, so we get a chance to help you.

Cheers
abdul099 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 26, 2011, 17:08
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Ryne Whitehill
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 312
Rep Power: 18
rwryne is on a distinguished road
Is it messed up at Surface mesh level or just Volume mesh?


If it is bad at surface mesh level, I have found turning off CAD Projection in the mesh continuum and turning off Retain Geometric Features in the Surface Mesh Solver Setttings can help sometimes. Strange as both those options sound like they should be truer to CAD...
rwryne is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 28, 2011, 05:39
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 14
Philipp Dietrich is on a distinguished road
Hi,

thanks for the replies.

I just tried to mesh with cad-projection and retrained geometry features turned off but the result remained the same.
The surface and the volume mesh both do not represent the exact geometry.

The prism layers and the surface size of the mesh are defined in the regions node.

In the volumetric control I just customized the trimmer settings.

I attached 2 pictures to show you the difference between the surface with and without a volumetric control.

I did not import any file to create the surface. I had a list of points that I imported into StarCCM+'s geometry tool. These points were connected by a spline.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf surface_with_vc.pdf (87.6 KB, 44 views)
File Type: pdf surface_without_vc.pdf (85.1 KB, 37 views)
Philipp Dietrich is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
airfoil, geometry, mesh, secants, volume shape

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how to set periodic boundary conditions Ganesh FLUENT 15 November 18, 2020 06:09
[blockMesh] BlockMesh FOAM warning gaottino OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 7 July 19, 2010 14:11
On the damBreak4phaseFine cases paean OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 November 14, 2008 21:14
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file SSL FLUENT 2 January 26, 2008 11:55
[blockMesh] Axisymmetrical mesh Rasmus Gjesing (Gjesing) OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 10 April 2, 2007 14:00


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:17.