CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

Boundary Layer roughness/ low reynolds wall treatment

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 8, 2012, 03:51
Default Boundary Layer roughness/ low reynolds wall treatment
New Member
Luigi Francisco
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 15
Luigi_ is on a distinguished road
Is my topic title an oxymoron? Does anyone have experience with wall roughness while looking at the boundary layer behavior?

I'm modeling the boundary layer along a wall of a wind tunnel. The boundary layer is what I'm interested in, so I'm using the two layer all y+ wall treatment that is an option with Reynolds Stress models and my mesh is resolved below y+=1.0 In the lab, my wind tunnel entrance isn't long enough to get the thick boundary layer that I want, so I use a boundary layer trip of sand particles upstream from where I'm looking at the boundary layer behavior. Can I model this with a roughness height, or will it not mean anything since I'm resolving my first wall cell and the rougness parameter is greater than the y+ of this first cell?

If just specifying wall roughness for the region doesn't work, any feedback on my ideas?
1. Use a different mesh where the trip is located. Being an all y+ wall treatment, if I use a first wall cell thickness that corresponds to a high y+ treatment, shouldn't the roughness factor be compatible with this?

2. For the fluid around the boundary layer trip surface, separate it into a different region, then I could assign a different physics continua to it (I guess if I still have a small mesh there, it still wouldn't be legit).

3. Model the boundary layer trip explicitly.

Any feedback would be great. Just seeing if there is anyone out there that has modeling something similarly. Thanks!
Luigi_ is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 14, 2012, 08:40
Ryan Coe
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 98
Rep Power: 16
ryancoe is on a distinguished road
One solution I have seen for dealing with trip strips (I think this is what you're suggested in option 2), is to use two regions:

- A region upstream of the trip strip which uses a laminar formulation

- A region downstream of the trip strip using a turbulent formulation

see the following paper for an example

Kim, S.-E., S. H. Rhee, et al. (2003). Application of Modern Turbulence Models to Vortical Flow Around a 6:1 Prolate Spheroid at Incidence. 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno, NV, AIAA.
ryancoe is offline   Reply With Quote


boundary layer, low reynolds, roughness

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Domain Imbalance HMR CFX 5 October 10, 2016 05:57
How to use a variable sand roughness height in wall boundary?? Kelly CFX 0 September 28, 2011 11:01
low reynolds k omega / wall functions stawrogin OpenFOAM 1 March 30, 2011 06:04
New topic on same subject - Flow around race car Tudor Miron CFX 15 April 2, 2004 06:18
Wall functions Abhijit Tilak Main CFD Forum 6 February 5, 1999 01:16

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:50.