CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > SU2

SU2_GEO - strange outputs when using FUSELAGE geometry

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 29, 2019, 09:55
Default SU2_GEO - strange outputs when using FUSELAGE geometry
  #1
Member
 
Cameron
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 9
c_dowd is on a distinguished road
I'm testing a case to eventually use for shape optimisation, just to find the minimum drag geometry.


To start with I'm doing a Euler simulation, but will hopefully do a full viscous RANS simulation if resources allow.


Right now however I'm having dificulty with the SU2_GEO outputs. It seems to correctly find the extents of my geometry, however it doesn't correctly calculate the widths and heights at each station. It also calculates a length, which I don't understand.


Below is the fuselage_description output for my geometry. The x measurements make sense, some of the height and width values make sense, but then they suddenly become very small at about x=0.


Can anyone help explain some of this output? The length values don't make sense to me for a fuselage, and I'm not sure what it means by the axis curve (the geometry is symmetric about the xz plane, with the axis along the x direction at y,z=0).



Code:
 "x (m)","Area (m^2)","Length (m)","Width (m)","Waterline width (m)","Height (m)","Curvature (1/in)","Generatrix Curve X (m)","Generatrix Curve Y (m)","Generatrix Curve Z (m)","Axis Curve X (m)","Axis Curve Y (m)","Axis Curve Z (m)"
-0.391666, 2.0572e-06, 0.0107867, 0.00233133, 0, 0.0104941, 0.000580435, -0.391666, 0.0380485, -0.0107661, -0.391666, 0.0392142, -0.00551907
-0.337499, 2.2235e-06, 0.0195423, 0.000836897, 0, 0.00770312, 11.5096, -0.337499, 0.108548, -0.00860205, -0.337499, 0.108967, -0.00475049
-0.283332, 0.000498456, 0.151218, 0.0983626, 0, 0.111776, 15.3905, -0.283332, 0.0430669, -0.109861, -0.283332, 0.0922482, -0.0539724
-0.229166, 0.000274447, 0.149868, 0.0789213, 0, 0.115905, 14.358, -0.229166, 0.0827403, 0.115058, -0.229166, 0.122201, 0.0571055
-0.174999, 0.000190178, 0.140332, 0.0710254, 0, 0.120144, 10.8545, -0.174999, 0.104153, -0.11851, -0.174999, 0.139665, -0.0584383
-0.120833, 0.000329543, 0.147292, 0.0737461, 0, 0.126231, 12.6581, -0.120832, 0.110108, -0.125257, -0.120832, 0.146981, -0.0621417
-0.0666659, 8.04237e-06, 0.0376818, 0.000667993, 0, 0.0129337, 11.4911, -0.0666658, 0.187772, -0.013628, -0.0666658, 0.188106, -0.00716115
-0.0124992, 4.6593e-06, 0.0332159, 0.000633628, 0, 0.0130676, 0.0336452, -0.0124992, 0.188566, -0.0127798, -0.0124992, 0.188883, -0.00624605
0.0416675, 1.31539e-06, 0.0190956, 0.000594027, 0, 0.0129945, 12.3311, 0.0416675, 0.186328, -0.0119269, 0.0416675, 0.186625, -0.00542971
0.0958341, 0.000584583, 0.189552, 0.0900109, 0, 0.142377, 12.9921, 0.0958344, 0.0919278, -0.140776, 0.0958343, 0.136933, -0.0695871
0.150001, 0.000421042, 0.17877, 0.102838, 0, 0.144463, 10.4573, 0.150001, 0.0717813, 0.146362, 0.150001, 0.1232, 0.0741307
0.204167, 0.000416058, 0.181969, 0.109646, 0, 0.14333, 4.41099, 0.204167, 0.0555976, 0.145297, 0.204167, 0.11042, 0.0736327
0.258334, 0.000151298, 0.130896, 0.0600619, 0, 0.115696, 7.04878, 0.258334, 0.0939299, 0.117497, 0.258334, 0.123961, 0.059649
0.312501, 0.000577989, 0.186855, 0.128959, 0, 0.131756, 12.2512, 0.312501, 0.0120511, 0.13315, 0.312501, 0.0765305, 0.0672724
0.366668, 0.000212571, 0.138837, 0.0713514, 0, 0.109143, 11.7738, 0.366668, 0.0550459, -0.108348, 0.366668, 0.0907216, -0.0537769
0.420834, 0.000328104, 0.137141, 0.0760334, 0, 0.100087, 1.74348, 0.420834, 0.0341859, -0.0999613, 0.420834, 0.0722026, -0.0499178
0.475001, 0.000117446, 0.104337, 0.0573863, 3.24177e-05, 0.0807455, 1.02177, 0.475001, 0.0351131, -0.0811942, 0.475001, 0.0638063, -0.0408214
0.529168, 0.000201647, 0.102995, 0.0639467, 0, 0.0681053, 10.3901, 0.529168, 0.00924431, -0.0688659, 0.529168, 0.0412177, -0.0348132
0.583334, 8.16991e-05, 0.070826, 0.0496978, 0, 0.0491163, 14.428, 0.583334, 0.00248699, 0.0483997, 0.583334, 0.0279359, 0.0238539
0.637501, 1.89978e-05, 0.0361603, 0.023899, 0, 0.0266037, 1.17887, 0.637501, 0.00539012, 0.0262555, 0.637501, 0.0173396, 0.0129537
0.691668, 7.50935e-07, 0.0053006, 0.00296616, 0, 0.00349867, 0.811744, 0.691668, 0.00102289, -0.0034512, 0.691668, 0.00250597, -0.00170187
I also keep getting some strange pressure fluctuations on the fuselage surface, they consistently appear with different meshes so I suspect it's a numerical issue. If anyone has any idea about those that would be good too.
Attached Images
File Type: png Screenshot from 2019-04-29 14-52-03.png (66.8 KB, 9 views)
Attached Files
File Type: txt fairing_opt_inv.cfg.txt (17.9 KB, 4 views)

Last edited by c_dowd; April 29, 2019 at 10:18. Reason: Fixed code formatting a little
c_dowd is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 29, 2019, 12:33
Default
  #2
Member
 
Cameron
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 9
c_dowd is on a distinguished road
So on further inspection it seems to be due to the fact that it's a symmetry geometry, as the functions work properly for the Ahmed body example. Not sure of the easiest way to fix this, as I want to have the width and height of the body at various stations as constraints for my optimisation.
c_dowd is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 4, 2019, 05:18
Default SU2_GEO stange outputs
  #3
New Member
 
Angu Praveen
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 2
angupraveen is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I am also facing a similar issue. I'm working on the optimization of a BWB aircraft. Unfortunately, every time I run SU2_GEO to determine the wing thickness for constraints, I get wrong values. The thickness is in the order of 5-6 meters.

Is there a fix to this problem??

Kind regards

Angu
angupraveen is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
su2, su2 geometry, su2 shape optimisation, su2_geo

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ICEM] O-grid around wing geometry Anorky ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 15 November 27, 2017 14:43
Importing CAD geometry and Editing edges to match Ahmed CFX 15 March 21, 2016 13:39
Simulation of Flow through Complex 3D Geometry EmersonKB CFX 5 July 2, 2009 09:17
vitual _ real deneb FLUENT 3 January 22, 2007 05:31
Virtual/Real geometry. Jack Keays FLUENT 9 June 16, 2000 00:39


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:07.