CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > SU2

CFG file Set Up

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree11Likes
  • 5 Post By pcg
  • 3 Post By bigfootedrockmidget
  • 3 Post By pdp.aero

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old   November 12, 2021, 19:03
Default
  #2
pcg
Senior Member
 
Pedro Gomes
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 466
Rep Power: 13
pcg is on a distinguished road
Hi, right, in the context of an academic code, like SU2, these concepts require a lot of experimenting to gain a feel for how to setup the solver, more time than a master thesis allows I would say. But let me try to give you an answer.

Your first mission is getting the solver to converge, i.e. for the residuals to drop 5-6 orders of magnitude (for external aero starting from free-stream), and for relevant coefficients (lift, drag, etc.) to not be fluctuating or still changing significantly.
The common parameters (CFL, etc.) and linear solver settings help you achieve this for a given choice of numerical methods (you can find some advice here: https://su2code.github.io/docs_v7/Li...econditioners/)

The second objective is to get accurate results, and this is where numerical methods are important.
In general, you want a choice of methods (gradient methods, convective schemes, etc.) that has the lowest amount of numerical dissipation while still giving you a physical solution (i.e. without wiggles, spurious oscillations, carbuncle, etc.).

Needless to say, it is easier to get convergence with more numerical dissipation.

So, if you are approaching this without any experience you'd start with something very dissipative like ROE with MUSCL_FLOW= NO (i.e. 1st order convection) and GREEN_GAUSS gradients, and then try to improve upon it in the direction of MUSCL_FLOW= YES with WEIGHTED_LEAST_SQUARES gradients (2nd order convection with the most accurate gradients).

Then there are tuning parameters for the methods (like Roe's entropy fix) and auxiliary methods (in particular limiters) that help you operate close to the potentially more accurate end of the spectrum without instabilities...
A good compromise (in my experience with compressible subsonic cases) is to use the Venkatakrishnan-Wang limiter with a 0.05-0.15 constant, and Roe entropy correction of 1e-3.

This is all application-dependent as you can imagine, if you are interested in low-Mach, or supersonic, etc. you may need other schemes that try to cope with the particular challenges of those regimes.

P.S. This all assumes you have a good mesh for what you are doing
bkay, jdp810, PENGGEGE777 and 2 others like this.
pcg is offline   Reply With Quote

 

Tags
cfd, configuration file, convergence criteria, su2


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Using PengRobinsonGas EoS with sprayFoam Jabo OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 35 April 29, 2022 15:35
[swak4Foam] funkyDoCalc with OF2.3 massflow NiFl OpenFOAM Community Contributions 14 November 25, 2020 03:30
SparceImage v1.7.x Issue on MAC OS X rcarmi OpenFOAM Installation 4 August 14, 2014 06:42
friction forces icoFoam ofslcm OpenFOAM 3 April 7, 2012 10:57
DecomposePar links against liblamso0 with OpenMPI jens_klostermann OpenFOAM Bugs 11 June 28, 2007 17:51


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:01.