|
[Sponsors] |
January 30, 2022, 13:25 |
The math behind the Outlet BC
|
#1 |
New Member
PR
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Greetings,
I'm curious about how the MARKER_OUTLET boundary condition was implemented in SU2 in mathematical terms. Is this statement correct? The properties do not change while passing through the streamline, i.e., (𝑣̅ ∙ ∇)𝑢 = 0; (𝑣̅∙ ∇)𝑣 = 0; (𝑣̅ ∙ ∇)𝑇 = 0; (𝑣̅ ∙ ∇)𝑝 = 0 Some developer can help? Thank you |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Volume fraction at outlet not known | Bisht | FLUENT | 8 | September 5, 2017 02:38 |
Pressure Outlet - Effect of domain | bineet_aero | STAR-CCM+ | 3 | April 5, 2016 04:51 |
Pressure Outlet - Effect of domain | bineet_aero | Main CFD Forum | 3 | April 5, 2016 04:50 |
Outlet BC for disturbed Poiseuille flow | murx | CFX | 10 | February 22, 2012 13:55 |
outlet boundary condition | neil | CFX | 1 | June 17, 2002 00:57 |