CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ANSYS Meshing] How fine must a mesh be for flow over an airfoil

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 3, 2012, 16:55
Default How fine must a mesh be for flow over an airfoil
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 8
nottern is on a distinguished road
I've been working in a 3D simulation about a crossflow water turbine. Due to restricted RAM resources, my mesh was limited to a specific size.
I ran some 2D cases and with finer meshes there are still changes.

I'd be pleased to find some references about how fine a mesh might be when modelling flow over airfoils (even if in this case are hydrofoils)

Thanks in advance for your help
nottern is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 4, 2012, 12:54
Retired from CFD Online
PSYMN's Avatar
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,665
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 39
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about
There are too many variables for a rule of thumb... (Although if someone has some ideas, please share)

What you should do is a mesh refinement study. Create several meshes, each one finer than the next, run them all and see if you start to get the same answer between any two meshes...

For instance, if you have several meshes where 1 is the most coarse and 5 is the most fine, and if 4 and 5 agree on the answer (and are correct), then you know that you only need to refine up to the level you did in mesh 4. Any extra refinement (to get up to the level of mesh 5) was not helpful.

Try this refinement study on a simple model (just a wing or something) under similar operating conditions to your real model, then you can apply that ideal refinement to the real model...
Please help guide development at ANSYS by filling in these surveys

Public ANSYS ICEM CFD Users Survey

This second one is more general (Gambit, TGrid and ANSYS Meshing users welcome)...

CFD Online Users Survey
PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 4, 2012, 13:12
Default I tried that in 3D
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 8
nottern is on a distinguished road
I did a mesh refinement study in 3D. It was a pain in the neck, because I work with a complicated geometry and the RAM limited my finer mesh size. But, as I wrote first, looks like then when I compared in 2D with a finer mesh (I couldn't made that kind of mesh in 3D) I just noticed it wasn't enough.

I was thinking someone may have tried to make a correlation between some adimensional numbers and number of divisions, something like that. It's pretty difficult to find the info about mesh validation in papers (I'd try do the correlation if I had time and info)

Thanks anyway
nottern is offline   Reply With Quote


airfoil, element size, mesh

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gambit problems Althea FLUENT 22 January 4, 2017 04:19
2D Mesh Generation Tutorial for GMSH aeroslacker Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... 12 January 19, 2012 04:52
dynamic mesh airfoil oscillation aamer Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 0 January 25, 2011 08:29
Convergence moving mesh lr103476 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 30 November 19, 2007 15:09
Mesh for 3 dim Geometry Phil FLUENT 9 July 12, 2000 04:39

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:00.