CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

shadding vortex

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 9, 2011, 11:48
Default shadding vortex
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 15
Lombo is on a distinguished road
Hi!
i'm a cfd newbie and i'm trying to solve a tipical cfd problem: catching shedding vortex (shown in the figure below) generated by a steady flow around a circle (2D) with Fluent



i'm trying to solve it with a k-eps model (unsteady analisys). for the mesh i use a boundary layer around the circle and a triangular growing size mesh all over, (more thick in the tail) is this correct?
and about the wall condition, do i have to use one?

thank you very much!
Lombo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 10, 2011, 02:01
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
here one example for laminar flow:
Sans titre.png
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 11, 2011, 05:51
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 15
Lombo is on a distinguished road
thanks, but is not i was looking for....

now i undertstand that i can obtain the phenomenou by chosing a different viscous turbolence model according to the reynolds number...

is it correct?

thanks
Lombo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 11, 2011, 06:05
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lombo View Post
and about the wall condition, do i have to use one?
I answered to this question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lombo View Post
now i undertstand that i can obtain the phenomenou by chosing a different viscous turbolence model according to the reynolds number...
is it correct?
No the phenomenon doesn't depend on the turbulence model, but on the Reynolds number
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 11, 2011, 10:56
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 15
Lombo is on a distinguished road
yes! thank you very much!

i resolved the case with k-eps model, and now i'm trying to change their values (k and eps) to understand how they affect the phenomenou...

but i don't really understand...

moreover i would know how to choose this parameters
Lombo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 11, 2011, 11:25
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
k and eps are fixed (you impose a specific turbulent flowfield given by Re >> check litterature)
So you are not supposed to change their values as you are not supposed to change the inlet velocity (for a given Re)
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 11, 2011, 11:51
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 15
Lombo is on a distinguished road
i use fluent and with this software i have to specify the velocity at the inlet, k and eps (how choose them?)... i calculate the reynolds manually..
Lombo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2011, 01:31
Default
  #8
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
there are formulas for k and eps.
Check online help chapter 7.2.2 "Determining Turbulence Parameters"
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 15, 2011, 10:42
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 15
Lombo is on a distinguished road
what is the different between the steady and unsteady command?

i tried to solve a simple 2-d problem of a beam section:

with the steady solution a k-eps viscous model sometimes i cath the oscillation of the lift coefficient, but with the unsteady k-eps i don't reach the same results...

i don't understand why this happens, because in general the flow should be unsteady....
Lombo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 16, 2011, 02:02
Default
  #10
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lombo View Post
with the steady solution a k-eps viscous model sometimes i cath the oscillation of the lift coefficient, but with the unsteady k-eps i don't reach the same results...
If you get oscillations with a steady solver, then the oscillations are due to the convergence. Understand you solution is moving untill it reaches its converged value (if your model has a steady solution)
In unsteady solver, the oscillations are unsteady oscillations with respect of time (and not iterations as in steady solver)
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 3, 2011, 03:52
Default
  #11
Senior Member
 
Ugly Kid Joe
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 193
Rep Power: 15
vmlxb6 is on a distinguished road
Why are you trying a steady state solution ??????? Flow over a cylinder is not a steady state problem............ It is a transient case problem.
vmlxb6 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
creating vortex core line aay023 Main CFD Forum 0 September 15, 2010 21:49
Air-Jet Vortex Generator, request for some papers ROOZBEH FLUENT 0 July 12, 2008 10:28
Air-Jet Vortex Generator, request for some papers ROOZBEH Main CFD Forum 0 July 12, 2008 10:27
turbulent scales of forced vortex and free vortex lcw Main CFD Forum 3 September 1, 2005 13:40
Free vortex - forced vortex Armin Hofstädter Main CFD Forum 2 November 17, 1998 18:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:16.