|
[Sponsors] | |||||
CFX vs FLUENT for particle tracking simulation |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
iman
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: malaysia
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
hi everybody
I'm going to do some simulation of water flow in pipeline with particle tracking i have done some searching and found that it is very common to use FLUENT or CFX (becide that, my university has a license for these software), however i cant decide which one i should use since I'm totally new to CFD software!! i would be grateful if you help me answer these particular questions: - for fluid field (and flow) simulation, is there any difference bt the two software? - for particle tracking can i use either one? which one is better? and why? - finally, if i need to move to another CFD software (e.g. from CFX to FLUENT) or integrate with MatLab i s it possible? thank you in advance ![]() iman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
George Pichurov
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
Fluent can track particles, yes, and provides macros for integrating user-selected properties over the particle tracks. I have no experience as to what are the coding capabilities of CFX in this regard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2D in Fluent Vs 2D in CFX | mohammad | FLUENT | 5 | January 6, 2012 11:30 |
| Wall function formulation in CFX and Fluent | gravis | ANSYS | 0 | May 4, 2010 12:03 |
| CFX steady simulation | gharek | CFX | 1 | April 7, 2010 19:41 |
| FSI : CFX or Fluent? | icemaniac178 | ANSYS | 1 | February 19, 2010 07:33 |
| Gradient Discretization CFX vs Fluent | Scott Nordsen | FLUENT | 1 | December 3, 2009 19:50 |