CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Gradient Discretization CFX vs Fluent

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 2, 2009, 12:02
Default Gradient Discretization CFX vs Fluent
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 16
Scott Nordsen is on a distinguished road
I also posted this on CFX Forum but perhaps there is a Fluent expert who has looked into this

I am a traditional Fluent user trying to compare CFX runs to Fluent runs.

A few versions ago Fluent added an option under discretization for gradients

1) Green-Gauss Node based
2) Green-Gauss Cell based
3) Least Squares Cell based

I am having trouble finding help on 1) does CFX have similar options 2) what is CFXs default

If a simple answer exists (i.e. CFX only does #2 from the list above) that would be great.

Thanks in advance
Scott Nordsen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 3, 2009, 18:50
Senior Member
sbaffini's Avatar
Paolo Lampitella
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Italy
Posts: 2,157
Blog Entries: 29
Rep Power: 39
sbaffini will become famous soon enoughsbaffini will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to sbaffini
I don't have experience with CFX or finite element methods but in Fluent those three methods are used for the computation of the gradients in the cell centers. These, in turn, are used for the diffusive fluxes and for any convective scheme different from the 1st order upwind.

The method 1 and 2 are similar as both are based on an approximation of the gauss theorem. As this approximation requires the cell face values, the two methods differ by the way these face values are calculated. In the cell based method they are simply calculated as a simple average from the two cells adjacent to the face. In the node based method the face values are computed by a weighted average of the values in the nodes of the face. These in turn are calculated by an additional weighted average from the surrounding cells.

The node based method should be more accurate than the cell based one (it should be at least 1st order accurate on any grid)
sbaffini is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFX or FLuent? michelle CFX 7 June 10, 2014 07:38
Fluent and CFX Ale Main CFD Forum 7 July 30, 2008 21:14
Fluent Vs CFX, density and pressure Omer CFX 9 June 28, 2007 04:13
Reynolds Stress Model in Fluent Vs CFX Tim FLUENT 0 December 6, 2005 22:03
CFX vs STAR-CD and Fluent William CFX 20 October 29, 2001 13:55

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:07.