|January 24, 2008, 21:00||
PISO 50 with discarge coeff down???
when I simulate a Diesel ICE I get these results with a discarghe coeff Cd = 0.825: when I use underela = 0.7, scalar underela = 0.5 and drnp = 0.35 I get maximum PISO = 12 from the time of start of injection (SOI) til the end of combustion.
Instead, when I use Cd = 0.7 I get PISO > 50 many times at the start of combustion...and PISO < 12 after the start of the combustion...what is a possible reason in your opinion???
I've see the when the Sauter Mean Diameter drop under 10 micron (when Cd go down velocity rise up...) I get PISO > 50...but with the Lagrangian approach it should be better that the droplet is much low compared to the cell...where am I wrong?
And also...I've tried to run with time step at 1/10 of the original, also with underela = 0.5, underela of scalar = 0.3 and drnp = 0.1...I always get the same results!
Plase share your ideas!
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|piso||dontknow||Main CFD Forum||1||September 21, 2006 09:01|
|PISO||newposter||Main CFD Forum||1||February 15, 2006 07:20|
|Help with PISO||Beni||Main CFD Forum||0||September 30, 2005 10:02|
|Inertia Coeff.||Sham||FLUENT||0||May 1, 2005 23:57|
|Plot drag coeff,lift coeff VS angle of attack||John||FLUENT||2||August 29, 2003 13:06|