CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > CFX

Gamma-Retheta Model Issue

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 2, 2013, 05:40
Default Gamma-Retheta Model Issue
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Rathma is on a distinguished road
Hi there,

I am using SST with Gamma-Retheta model at default settings on RAE2822 airfoil at alpha=3.9deg, Ma=0.73 and Re=6.5e6.

I got convergence problem in my case. The RMS converges at first, but starts fluctuating at around 1e-5. The lift and drag force also fluctuate in a relatively small range.

The distribution of Cp near the airfoil is quite well compared with the experiment data (see the first attachment). However, the result of upper wall Cf is very poor. There are strange values after the shock wave near 0.6c, and the location of transition point becomes more and more backward as the timestep accumulates (see the second attachment).

I have about 200 grid point on the upper airfoil, y1=2e-5 in order to make y+ approximately equals 1. The boundary layer has 30 mesh layers with a growth rate of 1.1 (see the third attachment).

I would like to improve the result, solve the convergence problem and acquire a more precise Cf distribution. Is there any suggestions?
Attached Images
File Type: png rae-cp-test.png (9.3 KB, 17 views)
File Type: png rae-cf-test.png (6.3 KB, 14 views)
File Type: jpg grid.jpg (94.4 KB, 15 views)
Rathma is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 2, 2013, 06:24
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 14,083
Rep Power: 109
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
You have done a nice job on the pressure distribution, but you are correct in that your friction has a little way to go yet.

But your comments boil down to 2 FAQs:

With the main point being mesh sensitivity - have you checked it? Also, are you running this transient or steady state? It is often very difficult to converge the transition model tightly as the laminar separation bubble jiggles about, so a transient model is required if you want tight convergence - if the position of the transition bubble is important.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 4, 2013, 02:19
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Rathma is on a distinguished road
Thanks for your reply

I do agree with you that mesh sensitivity is the main point, but I am really not familiar with how to check it. Since the result is poor at the shock wave region, I tried to add additional grid points at 0.5c~0.6c on the upper surface of the airfoil, yet I found no significant improvement so far. On the other hand, I am running the case with steady state, and I think transient state may not be that necessary in my case.
Rathma is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 4, 2013, 05:03
Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,358
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 45
Far has a spectacular aura aboutFar has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Try transient solution. We are also working on transition model (s) and found that transient simulation is necessary for transition model.
Far is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Use of k-epsilon and k-omega Models Jade M Main CFD Forum 28 November 5, 2017 23:40
Issue with model reflection orzel ANSYS 0 November 13, 2011 17:02
Problems bout CFD model of biomass gasification, Downdraft gasifier wanglong FLUENT 2 November 26, 2009 00:27
multi fluid mixture model issue rystokes CFX 3 August 9, 2009 19:13
DPM model w/ Wave model - errors in documentation HS FLUENT 0 April 12, 2006 04:37

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:17.