RPI Model, Mesh Independent study

ThePhoton · October 11, 2015, 05:34

We're using RPI model in Ansys CFX, and there is a problem that if we reduce mesh size after a limit, the solution doesn't converge, it diverges....

I've read somewhere that RPI model is strongly mesh dependent, so here I am confused as I have to do mesh independent study...

So can anyone help me out here?

ghorrocks · October 11, 2015, 18:22

It makes it very difficult when numerical models do not converge as mesh gets smaller.

My recommendation is first try to get it to converge. Use the highest quality mesh you can generate, double precision numerics and small time steps. Then refine the mesh and see if it appears to be converging.

If it does not converge then have a look at how much it is moving about. That is the likely level of error. You can take the mesh resolution which works best and use that for your simulation, but be aware this is very risky and there is nothing to guarantee it will be similar in your actual simulation.

ThePhoton · October 14, 2015, 09:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by ghorrocks

It makes it very difficult when numerical models do not converge as mesh gets smaller.

My recommendation is first try to get it to converge. Use the highest quality mesh you can generate, double precision numerics and small time steps. Then refine the mesh and see if it appears to be converging.

If it does not converge then have a look at how much it is moving about. That is the likely level of error. You can take the mesh resolution which works best and use that for your simulation, but be aware this is very risky and there is nothing to guarantee it will be similar in your actual simulation.

Actually system does converge with a fixed mesh size, but when I go below that size, i.e. reducing diameter further... it doesn't converge...
means mesh independent study isn't possible... How to tackle this?

ghorrocks · October 14, 2015, 19:24

Sounds like numerical round off is causing problems. This can be helped by the suggestions I mentioned previously (highest quality mesh you can generate, double precision numerics and small time steps).

But if you you still get it then you have hit a fundamental limitation of the model. You have to consider whether the model you are doing is accurate enough to be useful.

ThePhoton · November 15, 2015, 06:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by ghorrocks

Sounds like numerical round off is causing problems. This can be helped by the suggestions I mentioned previously (highest quality mesh you can generate, double precision numerics and small time steps).

But if you you still get it then you have hit a fundamental limitation of the model. You have to consider whether the model you are doing is accurate enough to be useful.

What if RPI Model isn't useful... Can you suggest any alternatives for this? As it is written in its details that RPI model for wall boiling is strongly mesh dependent... So what should I do?

ghorrocks · November 15, 2015, 18:34

First of all - CFD of phase change is very difficult and there are few models which are universally applicable and converge easily. Most of the multi phase phase change models have a lot of empiricism in them and are very tricky to get running properly.

I would try RPI anyway and see how it goes for you. But if RPI does not work you will have to search the literature for other approaches. Be aware that it is quite possible that your simulation is not able to be modelled with current technology.

October 11, 2015, 05:34	RPI Model, Mesh Independent study	#1
ThePhoton New Member Join Date: Oct 2015 Posts: 5 Rep Power: 10	We're using RPI model in Ansys CFX, and there is a problem that if we reduce mesh size after a limit, the solution doesn't converge, it diverges.... I've read somewhere that RPI model is strongly mesh dependent, so here I am confused as I have to do mesh independent study... So can anyone help me out here?

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Mesh independent study	kmgraju	CFX	2	June 4, 2015 04:11
3D Hybrid Mesh Errors	DarrenC	ANSYS Meshing & Geometry	11	August 5, 2013 06:42
Mesh Independent Study	isuru	Main CFD Forum	17	March 26, 2013 11:35
[ANSYS Meshing] Any way around mesh study using mesh stats?	Torque_Converter	ANSYS Meshing & Geometry	5	June 4, 2012 10:07
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere!	sc298	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	2	March 27, 2011 21:11

October 11, 2015, 18:22		#2
ghorrocks Super Moderator Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 17,703 Rep Power: 143	It makes it very difficult when numerical models do not converge as mesh gets smaller. My recommendation is first try to get it to converge. Use the highest quality mesh you can generate, double precision numerics and small time steps. Then refine the mesh and see if it appears to be converging. If it does not converge then have a look at how much it is moving about. That is the likely level of error. You can take the mesh resolution which works best and use that for your simulation, but be aware this is very risky and there is nothing to guarantee it will be similar in your actual simulation.

October 14, 2015, 19:24		#4
ghorrocks Super Moderator Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 17,703 Rep Power: 143	Sounds like numerical round off is causing problems. This can be helped by the suggestions I mentioned previously (highest quality mesh you can generate, double precision numerics and small time steps). But if you you still get it then you have hit a fundamental limitation of the model. You have to consider whether the model you are doing is accurate enough to be useful.

November 15, 2015, 18:34		#6
ghorrocks Super Moderator Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 17,703 Rep Power: 143	First of all - CFD of phase change is very difficult and there are few models which are universally applicable and converge easily. Most of the multi phase phase change models have a lot of empiricism in them and are very tricky to get running properly. I would try RPI anyway and see how it goes for you. But if RPI does not work you will have to search the literature for other approaches. Be aware that it is quite possible that your simulation is not able to be modelled with current technology.