CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Water+ Vapour = It's impossible to have a solution which makes a physical sense

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By Stabum
  • 1 Post By ghorrocks

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 20, 2017, 03:13
Default Water+ Vapour = It's impossible to have a solution which makes a physical sense
  #1
Member
 
Stabum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Italy
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 13
Stabum is on a distinguished road
Hello to everybody,
I'm trying to simulate a centrifugal pump impeller in order to underline the cavitation phenomena. Before starting this simulation I read (and understood, I hope) the tutorial 28, dealing with a topic VERY similar to what I wanted to simulate.
I have firstly simulated my own impeller using "Liquid Water" as substance and got an excellent convergence (100000 Pa total pressure in stn frame at inlet and mass flow rate at outlet). I obtained (with 1E-6 RMS residuals) an overall efficency = 96% and a head = 20m.
Then I added a second substance (Water Vapour), activated the homogeneus model, Fluid Pair Model with Cavitation Option (Rayleigh Plasset Option) and I finally adjusted the Saturation Pressure (3570 Pa). (All the datails of my settings can be found in the tutorial n.28). Obviously the boundary conditions at the inlet (100000 Pa total pressure stn frame), and outlet (bulk mass flow rate), are the same of the previous simulation.
I used the results of the previous converged simulation (with liquid water as the only substance) as initial guess, but the bi-phasic simulation (despite the inlet pressure = 100000 Pa, which should mean that there's no vapour) cannot converge: Head reaches a value of 800m (when it should be 20/20.5 m), before the residuals start a asymptotic behavior.


I hope I have been able to describe what I've done. Please ask me to clarify better if needed. Please help me to find a strategy to obtain a solution which could have a physical sense. Thanks so much, guys
ragab likes this.
Stabum is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 20, 2017, 06:51
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Have you had a look at the results file? That should show you what the flow field looks like. If it is spuriously generating cavitation then at least you will know where it is coming from.
ragab likes this.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 6, 2017, 14:29
Default
  #3
New Member
 
ragab ando
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 9
ragab is on a distinguished road
i would like to understand how could I activate the mass flow outlet when i simulate a two phase flow
ragab is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out saii CFX 12 March 19, 2018 05:21
water hammer solution by finite volume method A.Maleki Main CFD Forum 1 January 20, 2010 20:46
IcoFoam parallel woes msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 9 July 22, 2007 02:58
Could anybody help me see this error and give help liugx212 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 January 4, 2006 18:07
Solution in Physical or Computational ??? Mohammad Kermani Main CFD Forum 3 April 2, 2001 02:29


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:43.