CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Some question about the advection scheme in DES

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 16, 2017, 23:54
Default Some question about the advection scheme in DES
  #1
New Member
 
dongqinli
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 8
TAKEDA dql is on a distinguished road
Dear everyone,
With the help of CFX 14.0, I have done a simulation about Landing gears using High resolution discretization scheme in DES form. But existence of the 2 variables named "Blending function for DES model" and "Velocity .beta" in CFD-Post really confuses me . According to the CFX Theory's Guide,the value of the former varaible is 1 denotes the user-defined scheme(e.t.c HRS) while 0 denotes Central-difference scheme. And as for HRS,the value of the "Velocity .beta" is 1 denotes the CDS while 0 denotes Upwind-difference scheme. But how can we explain the two images below?
I have attached the images of "Blending function for DES model" and the "Velocity .beta". So the question is what the real discretization scheme used in "LES" region of DES? A full CDS can contribute to the "LES region" (the blue region) referring to figure 1 ,while a HRS,namely both UPS and CDS can be found in the "LES region" according to figure 2.


Thanks
TAKEDA dql
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Figure 1 Blending function for DES.jpg (50.5 KB, 23 views)
File Type: jpg Figure 2 Velocity u beta for DES.jpg (171.4 KB, 20 views)
TAKEDA dql is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 17, 2017, 05:37
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,705
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
First of all, your software is very old. There is lots of updates and fixes in the current software so you should consider updating to the current version (V18.2).

The Blending function for DES variable defines the regions where the RANS model or the DES model is used. It does more than just change the advection scheme.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 17, 2017, 21:43
Default
  #3
New Member
 
dongqinli
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 8
TAKEDA dql is on a distinguished road
Dear ghorrocks,
Thanks for your prompt reply.
The grid for this simulation is about 12million, and only the HPC can help. Unfortunately, the current software in HPC is CFX 14.0, which I can not change. And I read the literature about DES-SST(Strelets 2001), so what I exactly concern is the real advection scheme used in the "LES" region for CFX, the CDS, or both CDS and UPS?

Best regards
TAKEDA dql
TAKEDA dql is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 18, 2017, 05:22
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,705
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
You should read the documentation for details, but I think it uses the central differencing scheme in the LES region.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question regarding QUICK scheme for 1-D convection-diffusion problems JHaw CFD Freelancers 0 January 24, 2017 08:54
Diffusion Advection equation discretization scheme Farouk Main CFD Forum 0 July 2, 2013 16:10
2nd order upwind scheme (Fluent and CFX) Far FLUENT 0 May 22, 2011 01:50
Using the localBlended scheme for DES philippebv OpenFOAM 1 November 18, 2009 13:38
Scheme documentation and question Mickaël Perrin FLUENT 0 July 4, 2002 05:21


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:47.