CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

The proper way of modeling interface when mesh motion is present

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 23, 2018, 14:19
Default
  #21
Member
 
katty parker
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 7
katty17 is on a distinguished road
Hi Glenn,
Many thanks for your prompt attention and help.


I need some time to implement your suggestions into the simulation. I will inform you about the result.


About the tiny subdomain; may be “thin” was a better term rather than “tiny”. Sorry for not clarifying enough. Attached is a brief description of the problem. According to this image, in reality when the outlet pressure gets higher than the inlet one (t=t0), the valve (the two moving walls) blocks the flow path and prevents backward flow in the duct. However we are not interested in flow distortion around the valve, and hence as is shown in the attached figure, we only used a subdomain to obstruct the flow path at t=t0. The difference between the pressure values at two sides of this thin subdomain is very high.

In my experience, the faster we increase in the value of general source term coefficient, the bigger pressure pulse we will see in our results.
About the pipe deformation; this error is occurs even if the walls are modeled flexible.


Regarding the convergence criteria; I was not able to bring the values of residuals below 0.0003 after that the valve is fully closed. Is it acceptable?


Best



Last edited by katty17; June 23, 2018 at 16:29.
katty17 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 24, 2018, 04:40
Default
  #22
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Is the opening action of the valve important? It is easier to assume the valve opens instantly, because you can then just start with an initial condition with a pressure difference and the flow progresses from there. You don't need to model any action to do this at all.

In my PhD thesis I used modelling shock wave flow very similar to this as a benchmark case for CFX4. This may be useful for you: https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/10453/20133
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 24, 2018, 05:40
Default
  #23
Member
 
katty parker
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 7
katty17 is on a distinguished road
If I got it correctly, you mean it is better to start the simulation from t=t0 till t=T+t0. This way we can provide the simulation with better initial conditions.
Seems to be a good solution because the opening action of the valve is not important for me at all.

Many thanks for sharing you PhD thesis. I downloaded it and need to read it. It should be replete with very useful information not only for this simulation but also for other cases.

Best
katty17 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 24, 2018, 07:21
Default
  #24
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Have a look how I modelled the shock tube in my thesis. Simple, nothing moves (except the gas, of course) and you should have no problems getting it to converge. My thesis also shows you how you should validate the model with checking convergence criteria, time step size, mesh size and other factors.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
cfx, interface, mesh motion, specific displacement


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Radiation in semi-transparent media with surface-to-surface model? mpeppels CFX 11 August 22, 2019 07:30
My radial inflow turbine Abo Anas CFX 27 May 11, 2018 01:44
Error - Solar absorber - Solar Thermal Radiation MichaelK CFX 12 September 1, 2016 05:15
Moving interface patch using mesh subsets lr103476 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 January 10, 2008 16:14
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? Joe CFX 2 March 26, 2007 18:10


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:32.