|
[Sponsors] |
Discretization of transient terms in steady state |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
anonymous
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 3 ![]() |
Hi,
I know that CFX uses a pseudo-transient approach to reach a steady state solution. However, I could not find any information in the solver-theory manual or in this forum if CFX uses a 1st or 2nd order backward euler scheme to discretize the transient terms. Maybe I'm missing something but does anybody know where I could find this information? Thanks and have a good day! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,688
Rep Power: 29 ![]() |
Your question confused two things:
Pseudo transient discretization vs True transient discretization transient discretization order methods have no relevance in the pseudo-transient approach since the solution should be independent of how it got there. I think you are asking for something else. Let us see what that really is.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
New Member
anonymous
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 3 ![]() |
Thanks for the quick response!
Please correct me if I'm wrong in the following. The set of governing equations is discretized in time even for steady calculations in CFX with a "false" time step. So time proceeds until a steady state solution is obtained. In order to solve the transient term in the discretized equations I need a scheme or method to do it. In the theory guide two are presented namely 1st and 2nd order backward euler. And that's where my questions aims at. I want to know which scheme CFX uses for the steady state case. The Fluent theory guide explains everything pretty clearly, but I want to know how it is done in CFX. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,688
Rep Power: 29 ![]() |
It may look for some like 1st order discretization, but it is not.
If you thought from the Fluent theory that is a transient scheme, then the answer you want is: "the same as shown in the Fluent theory" Nothing different.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
New Member
anonymous
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 3 ![]() |
So what is it then? Is there any paper/book/manual or something which describes properly what CFX does?
Last edited by LuckyGuy; November 4, 2021 at 16:03. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,688
Rep Power: 29 ![]() |
Exactly as described in the Fluent theory page
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
New Member
anonymous
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 3 ![]() |
I missed things up yesterday and got confused, but I think now it's clear to me.
So, CFX uses a implicit pseudo-transient under relaxation (see Fluent Theory Chap. 24.6 "Pseudo Transient Under-Relaxation", Eq. 24.99) to march to the steady state solution. Is there a general formula to describe this and how are the coefficients calculated in this equation? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,365
Rep Power: 139 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The coefficients are the linearisation of the non-linear terms in the Navier Stokes equations. They are updated each coefficient loop. This is also in the Fluent Theory manual, section 24.2 (especially 24.2.1).
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
New Member
anonymous
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 3 ![]() |
Now everything is clear. Didn't know CFX and Fluent use the same method, that's what got me confused, I guess. Thanks for helping me!
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,365
Rep Power: 139 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
A key reason Fluent and CFX came together under the ANSYS company was so they could share key bits of their respective technologies. Fluent did not originally have the coupled solver.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
steady state |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Transient thermal simulation with steady state flowfield | thx! | FLUENT | 0 | August 25, 2021 08:00 |
Convert transient case to steady state case | zeefar | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 1 | July 29, 2021 05:41 |
Initialize transient run automatically with steady state results (Fluent, Workbench) | jhz | FLUENT | 0 | April 6, 2021 13:48 |
Effect of initial condition for steady state vs Transient | prasa | ANSYS | 0 | August 22, 2018 04:45 |
Transient simulation -> Steady state solution | saisanthoshm88 | CFX | 3 | October 31, 2014 10:29 |