CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Rotational Domain and Radiation

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 27, 2023, 08:16
Default Rotational Domain and Radiation
  #1
Member
 
Meysam
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 6
MNMK is on a distinguished road
Hi everybody,

I tried simulating a model which includes rotational and stationary domains. I have the heat transfer in my model , therefore I used the total energy model. When I wanted to simulate it with thermal radiation (DiscreteTransfer , participating Media model), I get the error below:

Pitch change is not supported with Discrete Transfer or the Monte Carlo Model.

Is there any point that I should consider? How can I simulate a model which includes both rotation and radiation?

regards,
MNMK is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 27, 2023, 11:41
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,804
Rep Power: 32
Opaque will become famous soon enough
The message told you already:

You need the same pitch on both sides of the interface. Can you replicate the domain on either side until the pitch is the same?
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
Opaque is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 27, 2023, 13:15
Default
  #3
Member
 
Meysam
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 6
MNMK is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opaque View Post
The message told you already:

You need the same pitch on both sides of the interface. Can you replicate the domain on either side until the pitch is the same?
Hi, thanks for answer.
I have 360° Pitch on both sides. I simulated the model once with rotation and heat transfer but without radiation. This time I wanted to simulate it with radiation but made an error.
MNMK is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 31, 2023, 04:16
Default
  #4
Member
 
Meysam
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 6
MNMK is on a distinguished road
Hi,

is there anybody to guide me?

As I mentioned, the pitch changes are 360° for both sides. And I could also simulate the model without radiation. When I wanted to consider the radiation in my model, I face with the error. Is it something about my mesh quality?

+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| ****** Warning ****** |
| |
| Topology simplification cannot be applied to domains with |
| 'Discrete Transfer' or 'Monte Carlo' radiation if boundary |
| coarsening is restricted to face sets (default behaviour). |
| In order to allow topology simplification for these domains, the |
| boundary coarsening must be restricted to boundary patches by |
| setting the expert parameter 'radiation agglomeration option=0'. |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+

+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Radiation Coarsening Information |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+

Domain Name : Rotor

Target coarsening rate = 64
Number of fine grid elements = 1799137
Number of radiation elements = 46598
Actual coarsening rate = 38

+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| ERROR #001100279 has occurred in subroutine ErrAction. |
| Message: |
| Pitch change is not supported with the Discrete Transfer or Monte |
| Carlo model |
| |
| |
| |
| |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+

+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| An error has occurred in cfx5solve: |
| |
| The ANSYS CFX partitioner exited with return code 1. |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+


This run of the ANSYS CFX Solver has finished.
MNMK is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 31, 2023, 05:13
Default
  #5
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
The error message is pretty clear - you have a pitch change across an interface and this is not supported.

If you cannot find the error please post your output file and we will try to help you.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 31, 2023, 05:25
Default
  #6
Member
 
Meysam
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 6
MNMK is on a distinguished road
If you cannot find the error please post your output file and we will try to help you.[/QUOTE]

Dear Ghorrocks,

I am sending you the output file.
Attached Files
File Type: zip CFX_015.zip (6.5 KB, 2 views)
MNMK is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 31, 2023, 07:01
Default
  #7
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Please read the documentation, Solver Modelling Guide, section 5.3.3, about pitch change.

Have you tried Pitch Change Option = "Automatic", or maybe "None"? I suspect your specifying pitch angles are causing the problem, even though the pitch angles you define mean no pitch change is required.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 31, 2023, 08:13
Default
  #8
Member
 
Meysam
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 6
MNMK is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
Please read the documentation, Solver Modelling Guide, section 5.3.3, about pitch change.

Have you tried Pitch Change Option = "Automatic", or maybe "None"? I suspect your specifying pitch angles are causing the problem, even though the pitch angles you define mean no pitch change is required.
Hi,

I changed the pitch change option to None, then it worked. I read the section, now I have another question. let imagine two interfaces in 2 Rotation and Stationary domains have different mesh elements, but overlap themselve compeltely donīt we need pitch changes?
MNMK is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 31, 2023, 10:13
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,804
Rep Power: 32
Opaque will become famous soon enough
The pitch change model is based on the pitch of the boundaries touching the interface. It is independent of the mesh used to solve it.

Be careful not to confuse mesh with the geometry either.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
Opaque is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fluent Radiation/porous media Schmitt pierre-Louis FLUENT 26 September 1, 2016 10:29
Monte Carlo Simulation: H-Energy is not convergating & high Incident Radiation volleyHC CFX 5 April 3, 2016 05:41
Radiation Modeling Chris89 CFX 20 August 14, 2014 07:51
GETVAR Error in Multiband Monte Carlo Radiation Simulation with Directional Source silvan CFX 3 June 16, 2014 09:49
Error finding variable "THERMX" sunilpatil CFX 8 April 26, 2013 07:00


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:27.