|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Hello,
CFX recommands using the High-Resolution advection scheme over the 2nd order upwind (since it is bounded). The price to pay for a high-resolution scheme will however be a loss in the accuracy of the solution where physical extrema occur. Is there any reference/article explaining why the High-Res option should be used ? Some kind of assessment of this advection scheme. Also, I've read interresting things about limiters (superbee, min-mod, etc..) but I am not an expert and it's difficult for me to relate this to what's implemented in CFX. If anyone could make this clear, I'd appreciate. Thanks a lot, Felix |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| advection scheme, high resolution |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| High order scheme vs Specified Blend factor 1 | realanony87 | CFX | 1 | November 10, 2015 11:36 |
| high resolution scheme | venkatesh4386@gmail.com | CFX | 5 | April 21, 2014 00:37 |
| High resolution scheme??? | vijay | CFX | 1 | April 22, 2008 10:37 |
| High Resolution Scheme | Vinod Dhiman | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 2, 2005 06:55 |
| Multicomponent fluid | Andrea | CFX | 2 | October 11, 2004 06:12 |