CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Solution diverge with small element size.

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 22, 2013, 15:36
Default Solution diverge with small element size.
  #1
New Member
 
salvatore
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 15
stone123 is on a distinguished road
Hi All

I am using FLUENT to study the flow in an aorta. Specifically, I am performing a mesh quality analysis to assess the best element size and the optimal value of wall shear stress.

The problem is that the solution diverge with small element size. Specifically, a mesh with 700000 element (skewness is about 0.75) shows convergence while meshes with 1400000 (skewness is about 0.84) elements or 2100000 elements (skewness is about 0.86) show divergence.

Meshes with high number of elements diverge using either Simple or Piso algorithm at 3e-4 of residuals. The model has an inlet (velocity inlet) and four outlet with flow split boundary conditions (outflow), and the flow is assumed laminar.

Does anyone has suggestions on my problem?

Many thanks
stone123 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 23, 2013, 07:19
Default
  #2
Member
 
Vignesh KPV
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 83
Rep Power: 14
vigii is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to vigii
Try adjusting your relaxation factors
vigii is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 23, 2013, 16:13
Default
  #3
New Member
 
salvatore
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 15
stone123 is on a distinguished road
Thank you very much for your suggestion!. I have decreased the under relaxation factor for moment to 0.1... should I decrease more?.... by the way, I will work on it and let you now... thanks
stone123 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 25, 2013, 12:09
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,399
Rep Power: 46
flotus1 has a spectacular aura aboutflotus1 has a spectacular aura about
Maybe the assumption of laminar flow does not hold.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 26, 2013, 05:48
Default
  #5
New Member
 
salvatore
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 15
stone123 is on a distinguished road
I fixed it!!... apparently the problem was that I have split the mesh in several zones.... Once I have merged all fluids in the analysis, the solution converged rapidaly
stone123 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFL Condition Matt Umbel Main CFD Forum 19 June 30, 2020 08:20
[ANSYS Meshing] Problem with specifying first element size in 2D Mesh sigmundab ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 9 April 14, 2016 09:53
Pros and cons of the method of Space-Time Conservation Element and Solution Element Dwayne Main CFD Forum 0 October 11, 2013 07:43
Mesh element size sunilpatil Main CFD Forum 1 April 16, 2013 20:41
[Commercial meshers] ST_Malloc: out of memory.malloc_storage: unable to malloc Velocity SA, cfdproject OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 0 April 14, 2009 15:45


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34.