CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Superficial Velocity Porous Formulation

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 12, 2013, 12:58
Default Superficial Velocity Porous Formulation
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 12
Persil is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I simulate the flow around a vane with pressure based solver, k-e-model, energy on and pressure in/outlet bcs

The picture shows the distribution of the total temperature but the red spot is definetely wrong. Instead you should be able to see the trail of the trailing edge. This red temperature is even higher than my defined backflow temperature. there was some reversed flow in the beginning of the simulation but that went away. I checked bcs, adjusted under-relaxiation factors and continued simulating until next convergence but the temperature did not behave as wished...

then I stumbled over the superficial velocity porous formulation and I cannot judge if this default setting might cause this temperature anomaly... can anyone explain, if this formulation could influence the temperature distribution? I read the user guide concerning the SVPF but that did not help much

also, I am thankful for any other suggestions that might help fixing this
Attached Images
File Type: jpg SVPF.JPG (35.3 KB, 25 views)
Persil is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 12, 2013, 13:06
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 268
Rep Power: 17
Zaktatir is on a distinguished road
This is only used for porous zones. Do you porous zone?

List you numerical and BC details Please

Check the convergence or post the residual plot and flow imbalance report
Zaktatir is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 16, 2013, 06:22
Default
  #3
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 12
Persil is on a distinguished road
no I don't use porous zone. But even without using it, a superficial velocity is applied by default by fluent. The influence of this setting is unknown to me...

bcs: periodic (top/bottom), pressure in-and outlet, stationary wall

no rotating system, 1 cell zone,

using pressure-based solver
methods: green-gauss-cell-based, standard pressure, rest first order then changing to second order (see the spike in the residuals)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Residuals_vane1_vers1.JPG (42.7 KB, 9 views)
Persil is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 16, 2013, 12:32
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 268
Rep Power: 17
Zaktatir is on a distinguished road
carry on calculating and use local scaling for monitoring the residuals. Watch the imbalances and use PRESTO! for the pressure interpolation and the coupled solver in second stage
Zaktatir is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 19, 2013, 07:55
Default
  #5
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 12
Persil is on a distinguished road
I disabled the absolute convergence criteria in the residuals settings window and carried on iterating which made the irregularities go away
Persil is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
porous media formulation teejey FLUENT 1 April 8, 2020 04:56
Relative Velocity Formulation and Coupled Solutions Jean C FLUENT 0 April 23, 2013 11:50
Porous Formulation hbf FLUENT 1 July 1, 2009 07:20
superficial velocity discovolante Main CFD Forum 0 April 28, 2009 06:52
physical velocity formulation and porous media KLG FLUENT 2 June 10, 2003 10:14


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:06.