|
[Sponsors] |
May 27, 2016, 03:03 |
Fluent (point) probe value vs CFD-Post
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 26 |
Dear all,
I would like to have a point value of temperature in fluent at some special location. Right now, I use a monitor -> Surface Monitor and the point as the surface. Obviously, this is not very good, because a point isn't a surface, so I am not quite sure which of the "report type" I have to choose. Anyway, with any of them, I don't get the same value as I get when I use a probe in CFD-Post to determine the value. The difference is about 388K in CFD-Post to 367K in Fluent. So it doesn't look like it is just a matter of interpolation. How can I get the same values? What is the problem? Is there any reasonable way in Fluent to get a point value? Is the CFD-Post value reliable? Cheers, Philipp.
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. |
|
October 31, 2018, 21:09 |
|
#2 |
New Member
vương công đạt
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Hà Nội, Việt Nam
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 7 |
Same here, values from monitor different from CFD Post values.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
fluent divergence for no reason | sufjanst | FLUENT | 2 | March 23, 2016 16:08 |
Running UDF with Supercomputer | roi247 | FLUENT | 4 | October 15, 2015 13:41 |
circular cross section in CFD post processing, Fluent | Sahar FaPerhu | FLUENT | 2 | March 15, 2013 14:37 |
Transport mesh from ICEM CFD, to Fluent, to Sysnoise | Wieland | FLUENT | 2 | April 15, 2012 06:28 |
Fluent CFD vs Fluent CFX | gpan | FLUENT | 0 | December 21, 2011 13:09 |