CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Propeller blade setting. Is it correct?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By vasava

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 19, 2018, 08:09
Default Propeller blade setting. Is it correct?
  #1
New Member
 
Naveen Kumar Gulla
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 8
Naveen Kumar Gulla is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone,

I'm trying to simulate the propeller blade in fluent using MRF. Basically, I'm trying to get a similar result with the experimental data, to get the thrust and torque. However, the torque that I'm getting is a way too much different than the experimental value. I'm not sure what could have gone wrong.

I'll start with explaining the method that I'm using. After some search and reading in the forum, I found that to study a propeller blade, it needs to be segregated into three different sections, the front zone for translation velocity, a rotating zone that contains the propeller blade, and the downstream outlet section. I'm using k-eps model.
The figure below shows the setup that I'm currently using for my analysis, Kindly please advice me if there is anything wrong.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1.JPG (28.6 KB, 19 views)
File Type: jpg 2.JPG (31.1 KB, 15 views)
File Type: jpg 3.JPG (24.1 KB, 18 views)
File Type: jpg 4.JPG (62.9 KB, 19 views)
File Type: jpg 5.JPG (46.0 KB, 19 views)
Naveen Kumar Gulla is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 19, 2018, 08:11
Default Some more images
  #2
New Member
 
Naveen Kumar Gulla
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 8
Naveen Kumar Gulla is on a distinguished road
Some more images
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 6.JPG (24.1 KB, 16 views)
File Type: jpg 7.JPG (42.5 KB, 18 views)
File Type: jpg 9.JPG (29.8 KB, 16 views)
File Type: jpg 10.JPG (42.0 KB, 17 views)
File Type: jpg 8.JPG (74.0 KB, 15 views)

Last edited by Naveen Kumar Gulla; April 19, 2018 at 13:14.
Naveen Kumar Gulla is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 19, 2018, 08:13
Default Some more images2
  #3
New Member
 
Naveen Kumar Gulla
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 8
Naveen Kumar Gulla is on a distinguished road
some more images
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 11.JPG (29.0 KB, 13 views)
File Type: jpg 12.JPG (34.4 KB, 10 views)
File Type: jpg 13.JPG (27.2 KB, 9 views)
Naveen Kumar Gulla is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 19, 2018, 08:30
Default
  #4
Member
 
kiran Ambilpur
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: India
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 15
kiran is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to kiran
please refer to the fluent tutorials, there are plenty of examples also available online.
kiran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 19, 2018, 08:34
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Naveen Kumar Gulla
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 8
Naveen Kumar Gulla is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by kiran View Post
please refer to the fluent tutorials, there are plenty of examples also available online.
I have seen most of the videos, but no one has cared about results. They have shown only the procedure

Thank you for your reply kiran
Naveen Kumar Gulla is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 19, 2018, 12:59
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Kushal Puri
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 182
Rep Power: 12
Kushal Puri is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Naveen Kumar Gulla View Post
I have seen most of the videos, but no one has cared about results. They have shown only the procedure

Thank you for your reply kiran
I am nowhere seeing the RPM given in the BCs.
Kushal Puri is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 19, 2018, 13:15
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Naveen Kumar Gulla
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 8
Naveen Kumar Gulla is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kushal Puri View Post
I am nowhere seeing the RPM given in the BCs.
I have given to sta_dom
Naveen Kumar Gulla is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 19, 2018, 13:23
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Kushal Puri
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 182
Rep Power: 12
Kushal Puri is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Naveen Kumar Gulla View Post
I have given to sta_dom
But it has to be given to rotary domain right ?
Kushal Puri is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 22, 2018, 11:19
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Naveen Kumar Gulla
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 8
Naveen Kumar Gulla is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kushal Puri View Post
But it has to be given to rotary domain right ?
I have watched few tutorials from learncax and also viewed in Fluent help that when we are using SRF approach we can give motion to the fluid domain instead of rotor.

Thank you
Naveen Kumar Gulla is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 23, 2018, 07:59
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
Paritosh Vasava
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Lappeenranta, Finland
Posts: 732
Rep Power: 22
vasava will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Naveen Kumar Gulla View Post
...when we are using SRF approach we can give motion to the fluid domain instead of rotor.
You are using MRF and not SRF. Thus, you have to give the rotating condition accordingly.

Your setup seems ok except that you have set your stationary part as rotating and rotating part as stationary. This is already pointed out by Kushal.

The aim of most tutorials is to demonstrate how a certain scenario can be simulated with fluent. All the official Ansys tutorial discuss results and some verification methods briefly. Of course you yourself will have to figure out how you post-process your case to get relevant results. No tutorial will do it for you.

I recommend that you go through the rotating machinery training material from Ansys. It has some very good tutorials and theory explanations about frame of reference usage. Here is the link.
Kushal Puri likes this.
vasava is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
3D CFD simulation of propeller blade - Turbulent viscosity limited to viscosity ratio Quentin_C FLUENT 1 April 4, 2017 05:32
Propeller blade setting. Is it correct? zizie FLUENT 20 October 16, 2016 10:18
[TurboGrid] Slotted rotor Blade using Turbogrid drcsm ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 0 March 15, 2016 00:26
Ansys Matlab integration: 'propeller blade shape optimization' usamatoson ANSYS 1 November 22, 2015 06:16
[snappyHexMesh] determining displacement for added points CFDnewbie147 OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 1 October 22, 2013 09:53


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:10.