|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Yoser
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Hi all
I am working on 3D simulation for my model and used k-ε TM with standard wall function. So,the values of y+ <30. Is it true y+ value that for models mentioned k-epsilon? If not, what is the certain range of y+ value for this TM. Thanks, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,836
Rep Power: 68 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
There are blending functions to make the wall functions play nice so that you don't strictly need to make any y+ criteria except small. But it's nicer to have a globally y+<10 or so such that everything is in the linear regime or avoid the buffer region between 10-30 and make all your y+>30. The y+ criteria isn't actually for the turbulence model but for the wall function being used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
New Member
Yoser
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Thank you to fast reply LuckyTran. You mean my result value for y+ is not true and shoud be in range less than 10.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,836
Rep Power: 68 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sorry I don't understand your question. y+ is y+, you get what you get. If you want a desired y+ then you need to go back and remesh. My point is that you can have just about any value of y+ and still have quite a reasonable result.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Y+ in k epsilon model for bubble column | ROY4 | CFX | 3 | March 14, 2018 14:50 |
| Question about adaptive timestepping | Guille1811 | CFX | 25 | November 12, 2017 18:38 |
| At high Y+ values does the K Omega SST model just behave like the K Epsilon model? | JuPa | CFX | 0 | December 22, 2015 07:44 |
| An error has occurred in cfx5solve: | volo87 | CFX | 5 | June 14, 2013 18:44 |
| SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded | nedved | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | November 25, 2008 21:21 |